June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Assessment of the BIONIKO prosthetic surgical training tools
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ken Steinegger
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • Ali Dirani
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • Ciara Bergin
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • Cedric Mayer
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • François Majo
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • Francine Behar-Cohen
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • Jean-Antoine C Pournaras
    University Hospital, Hôpital Ophtalmique Jules-Gonin, Lausanne 7, Switzerland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ken Steinegger, None; Ali Dirani, None; Ciara Bergin, None; Cedric Mayer, None; François Majo, None; Francine Behar-Cohen, None; Jean-Antoine C Pournaras, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 136. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ken Steinegger, Ali Dirani, Ciara Bergin, Cedric Mayer, François Majo, Francine Behar-Cohen, Jean-Antoine C Pournaras; Assessment of the BIONIKO prosthetic surgical training tools. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):136. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Prosthetic models of components of the eye have been developed as surgical training aids in ophthalmology. This study was designed to examine the utility of the rhexis-model and the kerato-model developed by BIONIKO LLC (Miami, Florida, US) as a training tools for surgically naive residents. The aim was to quantify the improvement in surgical skills afforded, in terms of change in speed and accuracy when performing capsulorhexis and corneal sutures.

Methods: Nineteen surgically naive ophthalmology residents participated in this study. Every resident had 10 rhexis-models and 5 kerato-models for training. Performance was assessed based on the outcome of the first 2 rhexis-model/the first kerato-model and compared to the outcome from the last 2 rhexis-model/the last kerato-mode. Between the assessment points the resident trained independently using the remaining 6 rhexis-model and 3 kerato-model prostheses provided. A “capsulorhexis score” based on time taken, corneal wound integrity, shape and centration of the rhexis was developed to reflect overall performance. Similarily a “kerato score” based on average time taken to perform sutures, position and integrity of the graft, symmetry, radiality and tightness of the corneal sutures was also developed. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre and post training outcome measures.

Results: In rhexis-model, comparing outcomes at the beginning and at the end of training, the maneuver was performed 39% faster (3.6 minutes vs 2.2 minutes, p<0.01); circularity improved by 42% (0.43 vs 0.25, where 0 represents a perfect circle p<0.01) and rhexis decentration significantly decreased (0.83 mm vs 0.47 mm, p<0.01). In the kerato-model, corneal sutures were performed 42% faster (9.6mins vs 5.5 mins, p<0.01) Position, integrity of the graft, symmetry, radiality and tightness also improved significantly[b1] . The capsulorhexis and kerato scores improved significantly from 2 and 13.8 before training to 5 and 23.1 at the end of training (p<0.01 for both respectively).

Conclusions: The BIONIKO prosthetic models were shown to be effective training tools for improving the accuracy and speed of surgically naive residents in performing the capsulorhexis and corneal sutures. Also since there is no special storage, sanitary or expiration considerations these tools have the potential to simplify practice and maintenance in surgical skills laboratories.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×