June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Evaluating the Utility of Postoperative Photos as Educational Tools in Trichiasis Surgery Training
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Richard Sidney Dykstra
    Epidemiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
  • Shannath L Merbs
    Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Sch of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Beatriz E Munoz
    Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Sch of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • Emily W Gower
    Epidemiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
    Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Richard Dykstra, None; Shannath Merbs, None; Beatriz Munoz, None; Emily Gower, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 137. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Richard Sidney Dykstra, Shannath L Merbs, Beatriz E Munoz, Emily W Gower; Evaluating the Utility of Postoperative Photos as Educational Tools in Trichiasis Surgery Training. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):137.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: In trachomatous trichiasis (TT) surgery, poor surgical quality contributes significantly to high postoperative TT rates. We examined 1) the accuracy of experts in evaluating a standard set of immediate post-op photos and 2) the expert trainers’ perceived benefits of such photos for improving training.

Methods: We compiled a series of post-op photos with an equal distribution of each outcome of interest: good quality, over-rotation, under-rotation, and eyelid contour abnormality (ECA). We assigned each photo a gold-standard grade, based on our team consensus. We asked a group of TT surgery experts, including ophthalmologists and ophthalmic nurses to participate. First, we showed a series of immediate post-op photos to discuss common surgical mistakes and long-term consequences. Next, the participants evaluated 122 immediate post-op photos and recorded the most apparent surgical mistake (none, over-rotation, under-rotation, or ECA). We compared participant responses to our gold standard answers. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding their opinions on the feasibility and potential benefit of these photos as educational tools.

Results: 19 participants evaluated the photos and completed the questionnaire. Overall, participant responses agreed with the gold standard 84% of the time. Individual participant scores ranged from 67%-98%; 15 agreed with the gold standard response on at least 80% of the photos. Participants had the least difficulty identifying eyelids with under- or over-correction (84 and 89% accuracy, respectively). However, the gold standard photos for ECA were difficult to identify; only 74% of the time did participants correctly record ECA. For these, many participants recommended having the option to mark multiple mistakes. Participants agreed that post-op photos would be beneficial for improving the classroom (94%), live-surgery (100%), and examination (94%) portions of training. They indicated that the photos would be useful for demonstrating common mistakes (100%), good surgical outcomes (89%), and long-term complications (79%).

Conclusions: This study showed significant promise for developing a set of training materials that can be used both in teaching and examining trichiasis surgery trainees. From these findings, we can begin to develop meaningful, internationally-standardized educational tools based on documented consensus and discussion.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×