June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Comparing toricity ratios across leading toric IOL manufacturers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lauren Gabra
    University of Illinois at Urbana Chamapaign, Urbana, IL
    The Eye Center, Champaign, IL
  • Samir I Sayegh
    The Eye Center, Champaign, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Lauren Gabra, Eye Center (F); Samir Sayegh, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 1916. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lauren Gabra, Samir I Sayegh, Optimal surgical outcomes group; Comparing toricity ratios across leading toric IOL manufacturers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):1916.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To determine the toricity ratio for toric intraocular lenses for leading toric IOL manufacturers

Methods: High, average and low axial length values were crossed with high, average and low averages of mean corneal power values to generate a 3x3 matrix of paired values. These values were used to generate a selection of a toric intraocular lens for manufacturers approved in USA or/and Europe. Using values of residual astigmatism computed by each toric calculator, a toricity ratio was generated for each pair of axial length and mean corneal power corresponding to each manufacturer. These values were compared to values published by the manufacturers and those predicted in the literature.

Results: Our algorithm helped distinguish the manufacturers using a constant toricity ratio from those using a variable one. Those using a constant ratio were using around 1.45; while those using a variable ratio ranged from 1.3 to 2.3. These variable ratio results are consistent with the calculation published in the literature and our theoretical framework and confirm in particular that as axial length and mean K increase so does the toricity ratio.

Conclusions: Our algorithms contribute to identifying manufacturers using a constant toricity, and the precise variation of toricity ratio used by other manufacturers. This technique will further improve our ability to select appropriate toric IOLs for our patients. The relevant methodologies have been integrated into our Universal IOL calculator.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.