June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Effects of Ambient Light Level Variation on Spectral Domain OCT-derived Anterior Chamber Angle Metrics in Non-Asians vs. Asians
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ken Marion
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Moritz Niemeyer
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Anna Dastiridou
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Brian Francis
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Srinivas R Sadda
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Vikas Chopra
    DIRC, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ken Marion, None; Moritz Niemeyer, None; Anna Dastiridou, None; Brian Francis, None; Srinivas Sadda, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec (F), Carl Zeiss Meditec (R), Optos (C), Optos (F), Optos (R); Vikas Chopra, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 1954. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ken Marion, Moritz Niemeyer, Anna Dastiridou, Brian Francis, Srinivas R Sadda, Vikas Chopra; Effects of Ambient Light Level Variation on Spectral Domain OCT-derived Anterior Chamber Angle Metrics in Non-Asians vs. Asians. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):1954.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To better understand the effect of ambient light level variation on spectral domain OCT-derived anterior chamber angle metrics in Non-Asians vs. Asians.

 
Methods
 

Non-Asian (n=24) and Asian participants (n=24) with open angles by gonioscopy had both eyes imaged twice at five strictly controlled, ambient light levels at UCLA Doheny Eye Center. Ethnicity was self-reported.<br /> Light levels strictly controlled using a light meter at 1.0, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, and 0 foot candle at the eye interface (fce). Each eye was imaged 10 times for a total of 960 assessments in the study. Zeiss Cirrus SD-OCT 5-line raster scans at IC270 irido-corneal angle were measured twice by 2 trained, masked graders from the Doheny Image Reading Center using customized Image J software. Metrics: Schwalbe’s Line-angle-opening-distance (SL-AOD) and SL-trabecular-iris-space area (SL-TISA). Delta change differences in measurements from brightest to darkest ambient light levels were computed. Statistical analysis completed using MedCalc v12.5.0.0.

 
Results
 

Non-Asian eye angle metrics (SL-AOD 0.443±0.114mm/SL-TISA 0.330±0.105mm2) are significantly larger (~38%, p=0.016) than Asian eyes (SL-AOD 0.322±0.120mm/SL-TISA 0.237±0.092mm2)(Graph 1, Table 1a). Asian eyes are more susceptible to light variations compared to Non-Asian eyes (repeated measures ANOVA, p=0.009). Light meter reading 1.0 to 0 fce; Non-Asian Δ change SL-AOD 7.89%, SL-TISA 10.71% vs. Asian eyes Δ change SL-AOD 13.39%, SL-TISA 16.54% (Table 1b). Excellent Intra- and Inter-grader reproducibility/reliability (Table 1c).

 
Conclusions
 

Anterior chamber angle morphometrics are exquisitely sensitive to changes in ambient illumination in all populations, especially in Asian eyes. Schwalbe’s-line based ACA metrics from the Cirrus SD-OCT could be measured with excellent intra- and inter-grader reproducibility. These findings highlight the need to strictly control lighting conditions in order to obtain reproducible measurements of anterior chamber geometry.  

 
Graph 1: Anterior Segment Angle Metrics [a] SL-AOD, [b] SL-TISA in Non-Asian vs. Asian Populations with varied ambient light levels
 
Graph 1: Anterior Segment Angle Metrics [a] SL-AOD, [b] SL-TISA in Non-Asian vs. Asian Populations with varied ambient light levels
 
 
Table 1: [a] Non-Asian vs Asian measurement analysis [b] Percent change from brightest ambient room lighting to darkest [c] Grader reproducibility/reliability
 
Table 1: [a] Non-Asian vs Asian measurement analysis [b] Percent change from brightest ambient room lighting to darkest [c] Grader reproducibility/reliability

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×