June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
An ex-vivo model for the short term IOP development for vitreous tamponades
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kai Januschowski
    department of ophtalmology, university eye hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Siegfried Mariacher
    Eye hospital, Sulzbach Saar, Germany
  • Martina Ebner
    Eye hospital, Sulzbach Saar, Germany
  • sven schnichels
    department of ophtalmology, university eye hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • jose hurst
    department of ophtalmology, university eye hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Peter Szurman
    Eye hospital, Sulzbach Saar, Germany
  • Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
    department of ophtalmology, university eye hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Martin Stephan Spitzer
    department of ophtalmology, university eye hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Kai Januschowski, None; Siegfried Mariacher, None; Martina Ebner, None; sven schnichels, None; jose hurst, None; Peter Szurman, None; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, None; Martin Spitzer, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 211. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kai Januschowski, Siegfried Mariacher, Martina Ebner, sven schnichels, jose hurst, Peter Szurman, Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Martin Stephan Spitzer, Johanna Hofmann, Lisa Pohl, Nele Schneider,; An ex-vivo model for the short term IOP development for vitreous tamponades. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):211.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Intraocular pressure (IOP) development of intravitreal tamponades (e.g. silicone oils) are either directly tested in animal models or in spherical model eye chambers; while model chambers are an artificial system without a functioning trabecular meshwork (TMW) and therefore do not reflect the physiological situation well, animal models such as the rabbit eye differ from the human situation significantly and are cost intensive. It was the goal of this study to introduce a standardized and cost effective physiological experimental ex-vivo model that can monitor IOP development with a functioning trabecular and uveoscleral regulation of the IOP and without the high costs.

Methods: Pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) was performed on pig eyes and silicone oils were injected (silicone oil 1000, 2000 and 5000, n=5) BSS served as control. Eyes were perfused with DMEM supplemented with 1.5 mg/mL glucose, 1% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS) and 100 U/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin and 17 g/mL gentamycin at a constant flow rate of 4.5 µL/min while the IOP was continuously monitored for 24h. To study cell death in the trabecular meshwork we used fluorescent in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated uridine 5'-triphosphate-biotin nick-end labelling (TUNEL, n = 5).

Results: The TUNEL assay showed a cell death rate of 4.12 % cell death (SD 2.25) in the BSS group (SD) compared to a 5.74 % (SD 2.27) after 1000, 2000 or 5000 ct silicone oil implantation (Manuwhitney, p= 0,209). In the BSS group initial pressure was 13.23 mmHg (SD 5.91) after 1 h, the pressure increased slightly to 18.46 mmHg (SD 14.31) after 12 h and was 15.51 (SD 11.10) after 24. In the 1000 ct group mean IOP after 1 h was 12.81 mmHg (SD 1.79), it increased to 17.30 (SD 7.48) after 12 hours and to 21.01 (SD 6.60) after 24 h. In the 2000 ct group the initial IOP was 10.00 mmHg (SD 3.10) after 1 h, 17.30 (SD 7.50) after 12 h and 19.48 mmHg (SD 11.11) after 24 h. In the 5000 ct group IOP started at 11.83 mmHg (SD 1.62) and increase to 22.14 mmHg (SD 7.46) after 12 h. The IOP remained increased at 22.33 mmHg (SD 5.99) after 24 h.

Conclusions: The trabecular meshwork showed an excellent viability thus indicating a good functionality. IOP development could be monitored for 24 h and is comparable to the literature indicating that the porcine model can be used as an excellent preclinical IOP assessment tool.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×