June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Instrument for simultaneous assessment of tear film surface quality and subjective vision
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David Alonso-Caneiro
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Stephen J Vincent
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Brett A. Davis
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Ross Franklin
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Michael J Collins
    Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships David Alonso-Caneiro, None; Stephen Vincent, None; Brett A. Davis, None; Ross Franklin, None; Michael Collins, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2498. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David Alonso-Caneiro, Stephen J Vincent, Brett A. Davis, Ross Franklin, Michael J Collins; Instrument for simultaneous assessment of tear film surface quality and subjective vision. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2498.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To develop and test a custom-built instrument to simultaneously assess tear film surface quality (TFSQ) and subjective vision quality.

 
Methods
 

An infra-red illuminated Placido disk reflects a series of concentric rings from the tear film on the ocular surface to a camera that acquires a video recording at 10 fps. Simultaneously, the subject observed a static target (Siemens star) presented on a micro-display monitor via a beam splitter. The subject continuously adjusts an audible scale [0 (bad) - 10 (good)] to quantify their perceived image quality over time. By simultaneously recording the videokeratoscopic images and the subjective vision quality score, we were able to quantify TFSQ over the pupil region, while simultaneously acquiring the relative quality of vision. To test the system, a set of measurements were acquired for 3 subjects under controlled blinking (a blink every 10 seconds for 60 seconds duration) and suppressed blinking (no blinking for 30 seconds duration) conditions. For each condition, an initial practice session was undertaken, followed by two sets of measurements. The measurements were taken during soft hydrogel contact lens wear.

 
Results
 

A correlation analysis between the TFSQ and the subjective vision quality score during the inter-blink interval reveals a strong correlation during the suppressed blinking conditions (mean Pearson's r=0.91, range 0.58 to 0.95, p<0.05). This correlation was still significant, although weaker, during the controlled blinking conditions at 6 blinks per minute (mean Pearson's r=0.62, range 0.51 to 0.71, p<0.05).

 
Conclusions
 

An apparatus and software methods to simultaneously record and analyze TFSQ and subjective vision was developed. The infra-red Placido disk light ensures that the pupil is not constricted during the measurements and that subjective vision quality scores reflect normal pupil sizes. The method may contribute to our understanding of the influence of tear film stability upon vision quality.  

 
Figure 1. Estimated TFSQ and the subjective vision score during suppressed blinking conditions (top). Representative videokeratoscopic images for a good (A) and poor (B) TFSQ during the inter-blink interval, the red regions mark the areas of severe break-up (bottom).
 
Figure 1. Estimated TFSQ and the subjective vision score during suppressed blinking conditions (top). Representative videokeratoscopic images for a good (A) and poor (B) TFSQ during the inter-blink interval, the red regions mark the areas of severe break-up (bottom).
 
 
Figure 2. Estimated TFSQ and the subjective vision quality score during control blinking conditions. The subject is prompted (with a tone) to blink every 10 seconds.
 
Figure 2. Estimated TFSQ and the subjective vision quality score during control blinking conditions. The subject is prompted (with a tone) to blink every 10 seconds.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×