June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Choroidal thickness comparison of non edematous and edematous macular areas in patients with diabetic macular edema using EDI-OCT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Felipe Pereira
    Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Stéphanie Fontanelli
    Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Eduardo Amorim Novais
    Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Caio Regatieri
    Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Felipe Pereira, None; Stéphanie Fontanelli, None; Eduardo Novais, None; Caio Regatieri, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2798. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Felipe Pereira, Stéphanie Fontanelli, Eduardo Amorim Novais, Caio Regatieri; Choroidal thickness comparison of non edematous and edematous macular areas in patients with diabetic macular edema using EDI-OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2798.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the choroidal thickness measured by Enhanced Depth Image (EDI) Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) in areas with and without macular edema in patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Methods: Sixteen eyes of 12 patients underwent high-definition vertical line scanning using EDI SD-OCT with frame enhancement software. Choroidal thickness was measured from the posterior edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid/sclera junction at 250µm intervals, starting from the center of the fovea until area without edema. Mann Whitney test was used to compare the choroidal thickness in both areas.

Results: Mean choroidal thickness measured in the area with edema was thicker in comparison with the area without edema (249,25µm vs. 236,57µm, respectively. P= 0,3). The mean superior border of the edema was compare with the mean adjacent area without edema (270,31µm vs. 262,87µm respectively. P=0,75). We did the same comparison in the inferior area that showed a mean of 231,18µm in the area with edema and 226,56µm in the adjacent area without edema (P=0,9).

Conclusions: There was no difference between the choroidal thickness measured in the area with edema and without edema in the same eye of diabetic patients. Additionally it was not found a choroidal thickness pattern, as it is observed in normal subjects.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×