June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Binocular vision with rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs at different orientations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tjundewo Lawu
    Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
    Research and Development, HOYA Corporation Medical Division, Tokyo, Japan
  • Kazuhiko Ohnuma
    Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
  • Toru Noda
    Department of Ophthalmology & NISO, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
  • Pablo Artal
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Tjundewo Lawu, None; Kazuhiko Ohnuma, None; Toru Noda, None; Pablo Artal, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 2984. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tjundewo Lawu, Kazuhiko Ohnuma, Toru Noda, Pablo Artal; Binocular vision with rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs at different orientations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):2984.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL designs induced asymmetric aberrations. This study will investigate the possibility to improve visual outcomes with the binocular combinations of this rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL with optimal orientation for each eye.

 
Methods
 

An artificial eye model with the rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL was used to produce retinal images. We used a 3D display binocular visual simulator to produce a fixed orientation in one eye of the subject, while different orientations were used to simulate for the fellow eye. Calculations were made for object distances at 0.0 D to -3.0 D in 0.25 D steps using the Landolt C optotypes for a 3 mm pupil with induced spherical aberrations. The monocular and binocular logMAR visual acuities (VA) were examined as a function of object distances in nine subjects. Average binocular VA for all object distances were compared to the monocular VA.

 
Results
 

On average, binocular logMar VA improved by 0.048. The maximum improvement was 0.053 in the orthogonal orientation of the monocular orientation eye. Figure 1 shows the binocular VA differences compared to monocular VA for all measured orientations.

 
Conclusions
 

Binocular VA with the rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL design improved about half line. Interestingly, it was found that the VA of orthogonal orientation binocularly was better compared to the other orientations. These findings suggest that the use of orthogonal orientation of the rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL design can be another binocular approach to optimize visual outcomes.  

 
Fig. 1. Average binocular VA improvements compared to monocular VA at different orientations. The monocular for reference is illustrated in black, whereas the binocular is shown in red.
 
Fig. 1. Average binocular VA improvements compared to monocular VA at different orientations. The monocular for reference is illustrated in black, whereas the binocular is shown in red.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×