June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Two Patterns of Spatial Tuning Occur in ON Ganglion Cells and Change with Ambient Illumination
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Peter D Lukasiewicz
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, MO
  • Robert Purgert
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, MO
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Peter Lukasiewicz, None; Robert Purgert, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3241. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peter D Lukasiewicz, Robert Purgert; Two Patterns of Spatial Tuning Occur in ON Ganglion Cells and Change with Ambient Illumination. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3241.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Ganglion cells (GCs) extract spatial information from visual scenes for transmission to the brain. They do so via their antagonistic center-surround receptive fields, mediated by cone bipolar cells (CBC) (center) and horizontal cells (HC) and amacrine cells (AC) (surround). The relative roles of horizontal and amacrine cell surround signaling are unknown. In this study, we assessed the center and surround contributions within ON GCs at different ambient illuminations.

Methods: Mouse ON GC light responses were recorded with whole cell voltage-clamp techniques in thick retinal slices. Center and surround contributions were assessed by clamping at ECl to isolate CBC inputs. AC and HC surround contributions were blocked by GABAR antagonists and HEPES, respectively. Visual stimuli were drifting sine wave gratings displayed atop rod-saturating backgrounds. Response data were fit with a difference-of-Gaussians model to derive the magnitudes and spatial extents of inputs. GCs were filled with dye for morphological characterization.

Results: Light-evoked inputs were measured from the same ON GC. All cells had strong CBC input, and weak HC input. However, the magnitude of amacrine cell input varied with ON GC type: cells ramifying near the mid inner plexiform layer (IPL) had strong AC input and spatial tuning, while cells ramifying in proximal IPL had weak AC input and spatial tuning. Increased ambient illumination eliminated differences between the mid and proximal IPL cells; both GC types showed significant AC input and spatial tuning.

Conclusions: Our findings show that there are two classes of ON GCs that exhibit distinct patterns of visual spatial processing at dim ambient illumination, suggesting a functional division in encoding spatial stimuli. The differences are attributed to the distinct strengths of amacrine cell input. These differences were eliminated when ambient illumination increased. We previously reported that two classes of cone BCs show similar spatial tuning and illumination dependence, suggesting that spatial tuning properties are present in cone BCs and then transmitted to GCs.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.