June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Trabecular Meshwork Engineering and Live Tracking in Perfused Porcine Anterior Segments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ralitsa Loewen
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Pritha Sengupta
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Devora A Cohen-Karni
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Sushma Kola
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Porter Ladley
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Amardeep Dhaliwal
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Jonathan Mandell
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Ladan Espandar
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Joel S Schuman
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Nils A Loewen
    Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ralitsa Loewen, None; Pritha Sengupta, None; Devora Cohen-Karni, None; Sushma Kola, None; Porter Ladley, None; Amardeep Dhaliwal, None; Jonathan Mandell, None; Ladan Espandar, None; Joel Schuman, None; Nils Loewen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3285. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ralitsa Loewen, Pritha Sengupta, Devora A Cohen-Karni, Sushma Kola, Porter Ladley, Amardeep Dhaliwal, Jonathan Mandell, Ladan Espandar, Joel S Schuman, Nils A Loewen; Trabecular Meshwork Engineering and Live Tracking in Perfused Porcine Anterior Segments. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3285.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To establish a trabecular meshwork (TM) engineering model using porcine anterior segments of consistent high quality in a physiological, fixed perfusion system.

Methods: Within 4 hours of death, porcine anterior segments were mounted after removal of lens and uvea. (1) Baseline parameters were determined in 22 eyes (CO) with constant flow rate and compared to 8 gravity perfused eyes (COG, 15 mmHg). (2) Gene delivery targeted to the TM was established using lentiviral FIV vectors expressing eGFP (GREEN, n=8). Additional eyes (ABLATED, n=8) were transduced with a conditionally cytotoxic (ganciclovir) eGFP FIV vector. Effects of targeted TM ablation were compared to those of non-selective cell lysis with saponin (n=8). (3) TMs were seeded with fibroblasts and adipose tissue derived stem cells that had been permanently labeled with an FIV vector and enriched by flow cytometry. eGFP was visualized through the bottom of a culture dish. Eyes were analyzed histologically at the conclusion of experiments.

Results: Porcine eyes were a reliable source for consistent and high quality anterior segment cultures with a low failure rate of 12%. (1) CO had a physiological IOP of 15.8±1.9 mmHg at fixed pump perfusion with 3 microliters/min compared to gravity perfused COG with imputed 3.7±1.6 microliters/min. (2) Some GREEN and ABLATED experienced a transient post-transduction IOP increase by 44% that resolved at 48h. Ganciclovir in ABLATED reduced IOP by 32% (3.2 fold facility increase) compared to a 20 fold increase of facility with 0.01% saponin. (3) Fibroblasts and adipose tissue derived stem cells populated the TM and exposed sclera but not the corneal endothelium. Increase in cell density ceased at 3 days. Histology indicated that prior to ablation transduction alone did not change TM cellularity. Cells seeded into TM were seen in the corneo- and uveoscleral TM.

Conclusions: Compared to previously used human donor eyes, this inexpensive porcine anterior segment perfusion model is of sufficient, repeatable high quality to develop strategies to genetically modify, ablate and repopulate the TM. Despite significant anatomic differences, effects of transduction and ablation in the porcine model presented here replicate the main aspects of previously explored human, feline and rodent models.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×