June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Retinal Detachment in a Pediatric Population: A Retrospective Review of Etiology and Outcome
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sarah Read
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Hassan A Aziz
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Ryan Young
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Timothy G Murray
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Harry W Flynn
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Audina M Berrocal
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Sarah Read, None; Hassan Aziz, None; Ryan Young, None; Timothy Murray, None; Harry Flynn, None; Audina Berrocal, Alcon (C), Allergan (C), Clarity (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3516. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah Read, Hassan A Aziz, Ryan Young, Timothy G Murray, Harry W Flynn, Audina M Berrocal; Retinal Detachment in a Pediatric Population: A Retrospective Review of Etiology and Outcome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3516.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Retinal detachment (RD), though a relatively common cause of blindness in adults, is rare in the pediatric population. The causes of RD are unique in the pediatric population and can be grouped into tractional (TRD), rhegmatogenous (RRD), and traumatic. This study aimed to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric RD at a single institution with the aim of clarifying the natural history and prognosis of this disease.

Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of patients 15 years old and younger clinically diagnosed and operated on for RD between 2000-2012.

Results: There were 206 patients included in this study, of which 41 had bilateral RD (total 234 eyes). The average age of diagnosis was 7.4 years and average follow up was 35 months. Of those patients 60 (26%) were grouped as TRD due to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), persistent fetal vasculature (PFV), and familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR); 51 (22%) had RRD due to myopia, X-linked retinoschesis (XLRS), or Sticklers syndrome. Traumatic RD was noted in 69 patients (29%). Other causes of RD included Coats disease and coloboma. Patients with a presenting visual acuity (VA) better than 20/200 had a significantly higher chance of better final VA (OR 7.3, p<0.0001). Anatomical success was strongly correlated with VA outcome (OR 103.8, p<0.00001), with only a single patient achieving vision better than 20/200 without anatomical success (0.4%). Anatomical success was significantly more likely in RRD versus TRD (55% vs. 29%, p<0.05) and globe conservation was significantly higher in patients with RRD compared to traumatic or TRD (p<0.05). The rate of obtaining a final VA 20/200 or better was significantly worse in TRD (33%) compared to RRD (70%, p<0.01) or traumatic RD (69%, p<0.05).

Conclusions: This report is one of the first to describe the incidence and outcomes of pediatric retinal detachment due to multiple etiologies presenting at a single institution. ROP and trauma were the most common cause of pediatric RD. RRDs were associated with the best outcomes (anatomic success and globe conservation) where as TRD has the lowest rate of positive visual outcome, indicating that prognosis in pediatric RD is not generalizable across etiology. Though good visual outcome without anatomic success is rare, good anatomic success did not predict visual outcome. This is important when counseling patients and their families.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×