June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Adherence to Follow-Up Appointments in a Resident Glaucoma Clinic vs. Primary Eye Care Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Brian Lee
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Scott Fudemberg
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Rachel Murphy
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Lisa A Hark
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
    Department of Ophthalmology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • Michael Waisbourd
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Yang Dai
    Glaucoma Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
  • Benjamin Leiby
    Division of Biostatistics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Brian Lee, None; Scott Fudemberg, None; Rachel Murphy, None; Lisa Hark, None; Michael Waisbourd, None; Yang Dai, None; Benjamin Leiby, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3706. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brian Lee, Scott Fudemberg, Rachel Murphy, Lisa A Hark, Michael Waisbourd, Yang Dai, Benjamin Leiby; Adherence to Follow-Up Appointments in a Resident Glaucoma Clinic vs. Primary Eye Care Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3706.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Glaucoma is a slow, progressive disease that is among the leading causes of blindness worldwide. However, patient adherence to treatment is exceedingly low. We performed a retrospective study to determine the role of telephone reminders in increasing adherence.

Methods: This retrospective, case-controlled study included randomly selected subjects from a cataract and primary eye care clinic (CPEC) and a specialty glaucoma clinic. Subjects in the CPEC clinic received telephone reminders while those in the glaucoma clinic did not. Each sample was selected to have similar proportions of follow-up recommendations of 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, and subjects were considered adherent if they returned within the specified timeframe. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare adherence rates between different clinics, age groups, genders, races, insurance statuses, glaucoma diagnoses, number of ocular medications, and follow-up recommendations. A logistic regression model was used to determine the odds ratios for each factor.

Results: A total of 144 subjects from the glaucoma clinic and 151 subjects from the CPEC clinic were included. There was no significant difference in follow-up rates between the glaucoma clinic (68.1%) and the CPEC clinic (65.6%) (P=0.65). We found that patients who were on more than two ocular medications were more likely to return for follow-up (OR=3.99 95%CI 1.92-8.30). Subjects ages 50 to 80 (71.4%) were more likely to follow-up than their younger (57.9%) and older (54.9%) peers.

Conclusions: The follow-up adherence of patients in a primary eye care clinic who receive telephone reminders is similar to patients in a glaucoma clinic who do not. Young and elderly subjects are less likely to follow-up.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×