June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Min Seok Kang
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Seung-Young Yu
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Hyung-Woo Kwak
    Ophthalmology, Kyung Hee University Hostpital, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Min Seok Kang, None; Seung-Young Yu, None; Hyung-Woo Kwak, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3724. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Min Seok Kang, Seung-Young Yu, Hyung-Woo Kwak; Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3724.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of focal verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC)

Methods: Fifty-two eyes of 52 patients with chronic CSC who had received verteporfin PDT were enrolled. The laser spot size of 26 eyes to cover only the localized hyperfluorescent area on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) was classified as focal PDT. The PDT spot size of other 26 eyes to cover total area including leaking point and detachment of retinal pigment epithelium was conventional PDT. The foveal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured using Heidelberg Spectralis OCT before PDT at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 12.

Results: The mean spot size for PDT was 1995.00 ㎛ in focal group and 2995.00 ㎛ in conventional group. Foveal thickness was steadily decreased in both groups. The mean baseline subfoveal choroidal thickness was 334.95 ㎛, 348.35 ㎛ in each group and there were no significant differences between two groups (p=0.602). The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased significantly to 304.20 ㎛ at 1 month, 284.85 ㎛ at 3 month, 271.60 ㎛ at 6 month and 265.95 ㎛ at 12 month in focal group (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively compared with baseline). In conventional group, it decreased significantly to 318.75 ㎛, 300.00 ㎛, 284.00 ㎛, 272.00 ㎛ at 1, 3, 6, 12 month (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively compared with baseline). There were no significant differences between two groups with regard to subfoveal choroidal thickness according to PDT spot size at 1, 3, 6, 12 month (p=0.602, p=0.565, p=0.659 and p=0.640, respectively).

Conclusions: Focal verteporfin PDT for CSC significantly resulted in decreasing subretinal fluid and sufoveal choroidal thickness as well as conventional PDT.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×