June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Evaluation of defocus curve performance with two visual acuity testing systems: ETDRS and FrACT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Janice Tarrant
    Abbott Medical Optics, Milpitas, CA
  • Eugenia Thomas
    Abbott Medical Optics, Milpitas, CA
  • Linda Tsai
    Abbott Medical Optics, Milpitas, CA
  • Sanjeev Kasthurirangan
    Abbott Medical Optics, Milpitas, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Janice Tarrant, None; Eugenia Thomas, None; Linda Tsai, None; Sanjeev Kasthurirangan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3891. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Janice Tarrant, Eugenia Thomas, Linda Tsai, Sanjeev Kasthurirangan; Evaluation of defocus curve performance with two visual acuity testing systems: ETDRS and FrACT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3891.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: An important clinical method to evaluate multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens performance is the defocus curve test. To have a clear interpretation of the defocus curve data, the test methods used and the metrics obtained from this test should be evaluated relative to other clinical measures. The aim of this study was to compare near visual acuity (VA) and defocus curve measurements with two different methods, standard letter charts (ETDRS) and a computer based technique (FrACT), in non-presbyopic and presbyopic subjects.

Methods: A total of 25 subjects were recruited (22 to 80 years; mean: 46 ± 15 years). Outcome measures included monocular manifest refraction of the right eye, distance corrected intermediate VA (DCIVA) at 66 cm and distance corrected near VA (DCNVA) at 40 cm with both the ETDRS and FrACT systems. Defocus curves (far visual acuity measured through trial lenses from +2.0 D to -4.0 D in 0.5 D steps) were measured with both systems. Near add power at 40 cm and push-down accommodative amplitude (AA) were obtained. Two depth of focus (DOF) metrics from defocus curves were evaluated: a 20/32 VA threshold (DOF-M1) and a 0.2 logMAR loss in VA from the 0.0 D defocus VA (DOF-M2). Age related trends for DCIVA, DCNVA and depth of focus measurements were evaluated through regression analyses and slopes compared.

Results: Intermediate VA (DCIVA) declined at about 0.1 logMAR per decade with both ETDRS (-0.367 + 0.009 * age; R2 = 0.51) and FrACT (-0.430 + 0.011 * age; R2 = 0.61). Near VA (DCNVA) declined at 0.14 logMAR per decade with both ETDRS (-0.455 + 0.014 * age; R2 = 0.58) and FrACT (-0.408 + 0.014 * age; R2 = 0.58). Depth of focus metrics (DOF-M1) and (DOF-M2), measured with ETDRS and FrACT, showed a significant relationship with age (p < 0.05 for all regression slopes) and had slopes between -0.6 D and -0.7 D per decade. Similarly, minimum near add declined at 0.6 D per decade (R2 = 0.83). All non-presbyopes accommodated well to the ETDRS chart, but some showed reduced accommodation with the FrACT system, especially through -3.5 D and -4.0 D defocus levels.

Conclusions: The ETDRS charts and FrACT computer system measured comparable reductions in intermediate visual acuity and near visual acuity and depth of focus with increasing age. Generally, with each decade increase in age, near vision declined at 0.1 logMAR and depth of focus declined at about 0.6 D.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.