June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Performed by Residents: Experience and Safety
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andrew Gordon Olivo-Payne
    Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Erick Hernandez-Bogantes
    Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Arturo J Ramirez-Miranda
    Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Alejandro Navas
    Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Enrique O Graue
    Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Andrew Olivo-Payne, None; Erick Hernandez-Bogantes, None; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda, Carl Zeiss Meditec (C); Alejandro Navas, Alcon Laboratories (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec (C); Enrique Graue, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 3929. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew Gordon Olivo-Payne, Erick Hernandez-Bogantes, Arturo J Ramirez-Miranda, Alejandro Navas, Enrique O Graue; Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Performed by Residents: Experience and Safety. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):3929.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) performed by residents.

Methods: A retrospective, study of 150 eyes of 86 patients with SMILE between May 2012 and April 2014 in one refractive referral center where included. Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), keratometry, follow-up and complications were analyzed.

Results: A total of 86 patients (150 eyes) with a mean age of 29.6 years old. The mean preoperative SE was -6.11 +/- 2.23. At month six, 81.8% of the patients had an UDVA of 20/25 or better and 93,7% achieved a CDVA of 20/25 or better. Adverse events were encountered in 32 patients (21.3)% being epithelial defect the most common. No UDVA loss was documented. None of the patients required a second intervention.

Conclusions: SMILE performed by residents is an effective and safe procedure with a minor learning curve.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×