June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Quantitative Ultrasonography of Vitreous Correlates with Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kenneth M Yee
    VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, CA
  • Jonathan Mamou
    F.L. Lizzi Center for Biomedical Engineering, Riverside Research, New York, NY
  • Ronald H Silverman
    F.L. Lizzi Center for Biomedical Engineering, Riverside Research, New York, NY
    Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
  • Justin Nguyen
    VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, CA
  • Jeffrey A Ketterling
    F.L. Lizzi Center for Biomedical Engineering, Riverside Research, New York, NY
  • J Sebag
    VMR Institute for Vitreous Macula Retina, Huntington Beach, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Kenneth Yee, None; Jonathan Mamou, None; Ronald Silverman, None; Justin Nguyen, None; Jeffrey Ketterling, None; J Sebag, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 4366. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kenneth M Yee, Jonathan Mamou, Ronald H Silverman, Justin Nguyen, Jeffrey A Ketterling, J Sebag; Quantitative Ultrasonography of Vitreous Correlates with Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):4366. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Vitreous floaters can significantly impact quality of life when affecting contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual acuity (VA) but there are no objective measures of vitreous structure for clinical evaluation of floaters. This study developed quantitative analysis of B-scan ultrasound (QUS) to measure vitreous echodensities as an index of disease severity and to determine if QUS correlates with functional deficits in CS and VA.

 
Methods
 

QUS reproducibility was tested in 10 eyes of 10 subjects. 35 eyes from 28 patients (56 + 18 yrs; 17 men, 11 females) with subjective vitreous floaters were assessed by QUS using a customized probe (15 MHz center frequency, 20 mm focal length, 7 mm aperture) in three different scan orientations (longitudinal, LONG; transverse, TRANS; and longitudinal to the macula, LMAC) yielding three parameters (energy, E; mean amplitude, M; and percentage of the vitreous body filled by echodensities, P50) from whole-central vitreous. Statistical analyses evaluated E, M, and P50 correlations with CS (%W, Freiburg Acuity Contrast Test) and VA (decimal of Snellen ratio).

 
Results
 

QUS was highly reproducible in the LMAC (rICC > 0.90) and LONG (rICC > 0.83) orientations. In 35 eyes with floaters, CS ranged from 1.2 %W (normal) to 5.6 %W (worst) (mean = 2.7 + 1.2 %W) and decimal VA ranged from 1.0 to 0.33 (mean VA = 0.76 + 0.19). Three QUS measures at each of two different scan orientations correlated significantly with VA: E in the LMAC scan orientation (R = -0.57, P<0.0004), E in the TRANS scan (R = -0.56, P<0.0006), M in the LMAC scan (R = -0.60, P<0.0002; Fig 1) M in the TRANS scan (R = -0.60, P<0.0002), p50 in the LMAC scan (R = -0.44, P<0.008) and p50 in the TRANS scan orientation (R = -0.48, P<0.004).<br /> <br /> These same six QUS measures strongly correlated with CS: E in the LMAC scan orientation (R=0.77, P<5.0 x 10-8), E in the TRANS scan (R=0.73, P<6.7 x 10-7), M in the LMAC scan (R=0.76, P<10-8), M in the TRANS scan (R=0.78, P<3.0 x 10-8; Fig 2), p50 in the LMAC scan (R=0.68, P<7.3 x 10- 6) and p50 in the TRANS scan orientation (R=0.71, P<1.8 x 10-6).

 
Conclusions
 

QUS objectively provides quantitative assessment of vitreous structure across a wide range of vitreous echodensities. QUS indices correlate with VA and CS suggesting that QUS could provide a clinically useful index of vitreous structural abnormalities in floaters and other conditions.  

 

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×