June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Dry eye profiles in patients with a positive elevated surface matrix metallopeptidase 9 point of care test versus negative patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Allister Gibbons
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Nicole Lanza
    University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
  • Felipe Valenzuela
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Victor L Perez
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
  • Anat Galor
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL
    Ophthalmology, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Miami, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Allister Gibbons, None; Nicole Lanza, None; Felipe Valenzuela, None; Victor Perez, Allergan (C), Baush Lomb (C), Eleven (C), EyeGate (C), Genentech (C), Parion (C), Rigel (C); Anat Galor, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 4431. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Allister Gibbons, Nicole Lanza, Felipe Valenzuela, Victor L Perez, Anat Galor; Dry eye profiles in patients with a positive elevated surface matrix metallopeptidase 9 point of care test versus negative patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):4431.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To compare dry eye symptoms and signs in patients who tested positive, versus those tested negative for ocular surface matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) detection using the InflammaDry point of care test (RPS, Tampa, FL).

 
Methods
 

In this cross-sectional study, individuals with dry eye symptoms, as evidenced by dry eye questionnaire 5 (DEQ5) seen in the Miami Veterans Affairs eye clinic, were given standardized questionnaires to assess dry eye symptoms and ocular and non-ocular pain complaints. A complete evaluation was conducted to measure ocular surface signs of dry eye. MMP-9 testing was performed using the InflammaDry once in each eye, per the manufacturer’s instructions. Our main outcome measure was the comparison of dry eye symptoms and signs in MMP-9 positive versus negative patients.

 
Results
 

Of the 56 total patients, 46% were positive for MMP-9 by InflammaDry testing in either eye. No statistically significant differences in demographics, co-morbidities, medications, psychiatric status, ocular surface symptoms and signs of dry eye were seen in patients based on MMP-9 detection status.

 
Conclusions
 

In our population, there was no difference in the profile of dry eye, in both symptoms and signs, between those testing positive versus negative for elevated levels of MMP-9 on the ocular surface.

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×