June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Reliability of a new modified tear-breakup-time method: Dry tear breakup time
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kyung Tae Kim
    Ophthalmology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Jae-hyung Kim
    Ophthalmology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Ju Byung Chae
    Ophthalmology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Young Tae Kong
    Kong Eye Clinic, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Kyung Tae Kim, None; Jae-hyung Kim, None; Ju Byung Chae, None; Young Tae Kong, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 4436. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kyung Tae Kim, Jae-hyung Kim, Ju Byung Chae, Young Tae Kong; Reliability of a new modified tear-breakup-time method: Dry tear breakup time. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):4436.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Tear breakup time (TBUT) is a useful technique to diagnose dry eye disease (DED). Measuring TBUT using fluorescein strips adds supplemental normal saline (NS) to the tear film and does not represent the actual state of the tear film. We introduced a new TBUT—dry tear breakup time (DBUT)—and investigated its reliability.

Methods: For measuring DBUT, 1 µl of 5% fluorescein solution was instilled on the end of an applicator using a micropipette. The applicator was sterilized using ethylene oxide gas after the fluorescein solution dried. The dried fluorescein was then instilled onto the lower palpebral conjunctiva without supplemental NS. Agreement between the two tests and their sensitivity and specificity were analyzed.

Results: The average age of the patients was 32.1 ± 9.7 years (n = 124). The DBUT was lower than the TBUT, with a mean difference of -0.63 s. Both tests had a low statistically significant correlation with the Ocular Surface Disease Index. The cutoff value for the TBUT was 4.48 s, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.790 and 0.548, respectively. The area under the receiver operative characteristic (AUROC) curve was 0.609 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.517-0.695). With a cutoff value of 3.5 s for the DBUT, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.726 and 0.694, respectively. The AUROC curve was 0.724 (95% CI: 0.637-0.801).

Conclusions: DBUT had a higher correlation with symptoms and a higher AUROC than conventional TBUT when DED was diagnosed with corneal staining. DBUT could be a useful and effective method in diagnosing DED.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×