June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Validation of the RD-OGI score as an effective tool for predicting retinal detachment after open globe injury.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tomasz Stryjewski
    Ophthalmology, MEEI, Boston, MA
  • Katarzyna Brodowska
    Ophthalmology, MEEI, Boston, MA
  • Evangelia Papavasileiou
    Ophthalmology, MEEI, Boston, MA
  • Yewlin Chee
    Ophthalmology, MEEI, Boston, MA
  • Dean Eliott
    Ophthalmology, MEEI, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Tomasz Stryjewski, None; Katarzyna Brodowska, None; Evangelia Papavasileiou, None; Yewlin Chee, None; Dean Eliott, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 4797. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tomasz Stryjewski, Katarzyna Brodowska, Evangelia Papavasileiou, Yewlin Chee, Dean Eliott; Validation of the RD-OGI score as an effective tool for predicting retinal detachment after open globe injury.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):4797.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: The RD-OGI Score is a clinical prediction model that was derived based on 893 open globe patients for predicting the risk of retinal detachment after open globe trauma. This study sought to validate the RD-OGI Score in an independent patient cohort to improve clinical decision-making.

Methods: A validation cohort was established by retrospectively reviewing the outcomes of 231 open globe injuries who presented to Eye Trauma Service of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (MEEI) from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2014 with open globe injury. Logistic regression was undertaken to evaluate optimal predictive value of RD-OGI Score. The sensitivity, the specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and probability of RD development were assessed for each RD-OGI Score cutpoint. RD-OGI Scores were stratified into three risk classes: Low Risk, Moderate Risk, and High Risk of RD development. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for time to RD was plotted. A log-rank test was used to test differences in survival experience between risk classes.

Results: A total of 66 eyes were ultimately diagnosed with RD after open globe trauma in the validation cohort at 365 days. Regression modeling indicated that RD-OGI Score performs the best in predicting RD for the 30-day follow-up time point (AUC=0.939, AIC=108.8). However, this Score also performed extremely well at every other time point. The Low Risk Class was designated to be RD-OGI Scores of 0-1.5 and none of the patients developed RD in Low Risk Class over 365 days. Moderate Risk Class was designated as RD-OGI Scores 2.0 through 4.0 with a probability of RD of 11-20% at all time points, and High Risk Class at scores 4.5 through 7.5 with probability 66-78% at all time points.

Conclusions: The RD-OGI score can reliably predict the future development of detachment based on clinical variables that are seen at the time of initial presentation after traumatic injury.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.