June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Subjective satisfaction scale of the patients after surgery for epiretinal membrane; 1 year results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joo Eun Lee
    Ophthalmology, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Inje Univ, Busan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Kyung-Won Seok
    Busan BalGeunSeSang Eye clinic, Busan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Seung Youn Jea
    Lee Eye clinic, Busan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • in Geun Kim
    Ophthalmology, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Inje Univ, Busan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Il Han Yun
    Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Joo Eun Lee, None; Kyung-Won Seok, None; Seung Youn Jea, None; in Geun Kim, None; Il Han Yun, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5061. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joo Eun Lee, Kyung-Won Seok, Seung Youn Jea, in Geun Kim, Il Han Yun; Subjective satisfaction scale of the patients after surgery for epiretinal membrane; 1 year results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5061.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate subjective satisfaction of the patients after surgery for epiretinal membrane (ERM).

Methods: Thirty three eyes of 32 patients who received vitrectomy for ERM removal and were followed for 1 year were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups; Group A with their baseline visual acuity better than 0.22 (LogMAR) and group B equal to or less than 0.22. Best corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT) by optical coherence tomography, metamorphopsia score by M-chart, and subjective scale regarding postoperative outcomes by questionnaire (scale range; -5 to +5) at postoperative 6 and 12 month were evaluated.

Results: Mean visual acuity (LogMAR) has changed from 0.05±0.06 to 0.06±0.07 at 12 month postoperatively in group A (p=0.981), and from 0.46±0.19 to 0.13±0.18 in group B (p=0.012). Subjective scale regarding overall satisfaction about surgical outcome at 12 month was 1.1±1.4 in group A and 0.9±1.2 in group B (p=0.574). Horizontal M-chart score at 12 month was 0.0±0.0 in group A and 0.4±0.4 in group B (p<0.0001). Vertical M-chart score was 0.2±0.3, and 0.5±0.4, respectively in group A and B (p=0.043).

Conclusions: Both the better visual acuity group and worse visual acuity group were satisfied with overall outcome of the surgery. Although significant improvement was achieved in terms of visual acuity, recovery in metamorphopsia score was limited in worse visual acuity group.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×