June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Perfluorocarbon-Balanced Salt Solution Interface Deflects Intraocular Foreign Bodies
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Chirag Shah
    Stony Brook School of Medicine, Brea, CA
  • Bryce Schroeder
    Stony Brook School of Medicine, Brea, CA
  • Mitul Mehta
    Ophthalmology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Chirag Shah, None; Bryce Schroeder, None; Mitul Mehta, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5104. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chirag Shah, Bryce Schroeder, Mitul Mehta; Perfluorocarbon-Balanced Salt Solution Interface Deflects Intraocular Foreign Bodies. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5104.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs) have been previously used to float various objects off the retina, and some surgeons have begun to use PFCLs during intraocular foreign body (IOFB) extraction. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of perfluoro-n-octane (PFO) to shield the macula from the impact of dropped metallic IOFBs by modelling scenarios in which they may fall during removal.

 
Methods
 

Model eyes were made of plastic spheres 3.5 cm in diameter. In each trial, model eyes were filled with one of several fluid mixtures (100% PFO, 100% BSS, and 10% PFO/ 90% BSS). The 10% PFO was used to cover the macula. 5 sample IOFBs (Fig 1 IOFBs A-E) were selected from metal debris of human-operated cutting tools in machine shops.<br /> IOFBs were submerged and dropped 50 times from several starting positions (center of the globe, touching the interior globe, or touching the central PFO-BSS interface). Trajectories were recorded using a camera attached to a Zeiss operating microscope. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess differences in number of trials impacting the macula between the PFO/BSS mixture and BSS alone.

 
Results
 

All IOFBs impacted the macula in all trials using PFO or BSS alone. IOFBs A, B, & C were deflected by the PFO-BSS interface in 100% of trials (difference significant vs. BSS, p<0.0001). IOFB D was deflected in 96.7% of trials from a central position in the superior fluid (p<0.0001) as well as 100% of trials from a peripheral position (p<0.0001), but impacted the macula in 33% trials when dropped from the PFO-BSS interface (p=.0964). IOFB E impacted the macula in 100% trials from the central position (p=1.0), but was deflected by the PFO-BSS interface in 100% trials when dropped from a position touching the interior globe (p<.0001).

 
Conclusions
 

This study suggests that the surface tension of the PFO-BSS interface may be used to protect the macula by deflecting IOFBs dropped during surgery. The location and characteristics of the IOFB determine the amount of deflection. As seen with IOFB E, IOFBs that pierce the PFO-BSS interface when incident from a central position may be deflected if tumbling towards the interface from a position touching the interior globe, suggesting that some amount of kinetic energy is dispersed by the surface tension of the PFO-BSS interface.  

 
Figure 1 IOFBs: A) Carbon Steel 3.1 mg B) Stainless Steel 3.0 mg C) Aluminum 2.8 mg D) Stainless Steel 13.4 mg E) Copper 24.4 mg
 
Figure 1 IOFBs: A) Carbon Steel 3.1 mg B) Stainless Steel 3.0 mg C) Aluminum 2.8 mg D) Stainless Steel 13.4 mg E) Copper 24.4 mg

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×