June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Reliability and Interchangeability of two Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Healthy and Diseased Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mariam Fawzy
    The EYE Center, Champaign, IL
    Spartan Health Sciences University, Vieux Fort, Saint Lucia
  • Jessica Taibl
    The EYE Center, Champaign, IL
    University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, IL
  • Hang My Tran
    The EYE Center, Champaign, IL
    Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA
  • Samir I Sayegh
    The EYE Center, Champaign, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Mariam Fawzy, None; Jessica Taibl, None; Hang Tran, None; Samir Sayegh, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5277. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mariam Fawzy, Jessica Taibl, Hang My Tran, Samir I Sayegh, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Imaging; Reliability and Interchangeability of two Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Healthy and Diseased Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5277.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Different SD-OCT systems yield different results in measuring retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. We tested the influence of macular edema on the difference in retinal thickness using two different SD-OCT (RTVue Optovue 6.2 and Spectralis Heidelberg 5.7.5) and assessed their reliability.

Methods: 96 scans from 54 participants were included in this observational clinical study with a breakdown of 34 normal eyes, 35 diabetic eyes with diabetic macular/retinal changes (DME, PDR, and BDR), 20 eyes with dry/wet AMD, and 7 eyes with macular edema not related to diabetes. 30 were females (56%) and 24 were males (44%) aged 59 +/-21 years old. Scans were excluded if a major artifact was present or if the scan or ETDRS measurement scale was not centered on the fovea and if high myopia was present (D≥-10.00) as the retinal nerve fiber layer is significantly thinner in severe myopia.<br /> Patients were imaged with both SD-OCT on the same clinic visit by the same operator and readings were displayed using the ETDRS scale. Patients were categorized into two group according to the cutoff value of macular edema using Heidelberg 318um .15 scans were above the cutoff. In 41 out of 54 participants, both eyes were scanned to test for intra-reliability in both SD-OCT using the Intra-class coefficient (ICC)

Results: Using the RTVue ICC values were 0.97 and 0.82 for healthy and pathological eyes, respectively. With Spectralis the values were 0.98, and 0.87. A single factor ANOVA revealed a statistically significant influence on the mean difference (MD) using the two SD-OCT when Significant Macular Edema was present. R squared revealed a 16% interaction level between macular edema and mean difference.

Conclusions: Reliability of both SD-OCTsystems was influenced by the presence of anatomical disruption in the retina. Significant macular edema should be taken into special consideration when applying an equation to use the two devices interchangeably.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.