June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
The Effect of Age and Refractive Error on Pupil Size
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kathryn Dumbleton
    OCULAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP - International, Berkeley, CA
  • Michel Guillon
    OCULAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP - International, Berkeley, CA
    School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Panagiotis Theodoratos
    OCULAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP - International, Berkeley, CA
  • C. Benjamin Wooley
    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc., Jacksonville, FL
  • Kurt Moody
    Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc., Jacksonville, FL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Kathryn Dumbleton, Alcon Inc. (R), Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (C), Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (F), Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (R); Michel Guillon, Alcon Inc. (R), Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (C), Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (F), Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (R); Panagiotis Theodoratos, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (F); C. Benjamin Wooley, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (E); Kurt Moody, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 585. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kathryn Dumbleton, Michel Guillon, Panagiotis Theodoratos, C. Benjamin Wooley, Kurt Moody; The Effect of Age and Refractive Error on Pupil Size. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):585.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The size of the pupil plays a critical part in controlling the performance of all vision correction modalities incorporating a presbyopic correction, including contact lenses, refractive surgery and intraocular lenses. While the effect of luminance, the dominant factor affecting pupil size, is well known, little information is available regarding other contributing factors such as aging and refractive status.

Methods: Three hundred and four patients (127 Male, 177 Female) aged 18 to 78 year made up the cohort population in this study. The non-interventional investigation involved a single visit to the OTG-i clinic. The pupil size was measured at three controlled luminance levels 250cd/m2 (daytime), 50cd/m2 (indoor lighting) and 2.5cd/m2 (night driving).

Results: The results obtained showed that: (i) Pupil size decreases with age, the effect being most marked at low luminance. At 250cd/m2 means: 18-39 yrs = 2.8mm, 40-54 yrs = 2.67mm, 55+yrs = 2.56mm (p=0.046). At 50cd/m2 means: 18-39 yrs = 3.68mm, 40-54 yrs = 3.37mm, 55+yrs = 3.21mm (p<0.001). At 2.5cd/m2 means: 18-39 yrs = 6.15mm, 40-54yrs = 5.49mm, 55+yrs = 4.99mm (p<0.001). (ii) Pupil size at low luminance is significantly greater for myopes (high myopes mean = 5.98mm; low myopes mean = 5.91mm) than hyperopes (mean = 5.15mm) (p =0.020). (iii) Pupil size changes modelled by multi linear regression (p<0.001) identified age (p<0.001) and refractive error (p=0.019) as significant factors at low luminance.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that both age and refractive status affect pupil size with larger pupils measured for younger patients and myopes. The implications for the design of multifocal corrections are that the design should take into consideration both the age (faster progression for higher near additions) and refractive power (faster progression for hyperopic corrections).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×