June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Multiple retinal circuits mediate local motion detection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Juliana M. Rosa
    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Hans C. Baertsch
    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Marla B Feller
    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Juliana M. Rosa, None; Hans C. Baertsch, None; Marla Feller, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5865. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Juliana M. Rosa, Hans C. Baertsch, Marla B Feller; Multiple retinal circuits mediate local motion detection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5865.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: In the mouse retina, visual signal is encoded by two photoreceptor types, rods and cones. Rods mediate dim light vision, however there is growing evidence that they also encode information at bright light. The majority of mouse photoreceptors contain two opsins with peak sensitivity in the UV (360 nm, s-opsin) and green (508 nm, M-opsin). The ratio of these two opsins varies across the retina such that in ventral retina, cones are dominated by s-opsin while dorsal cones are dominated by M-opsin. Here was compare the organization and development of rod and s-cone mediated contributions to direction selectivity.

Methods: Using two-photon targeted patching, we assessed the directional tuning of GFP+ On-Off DSGCs using cell-attached and whole-cell voltage clamp recordings. Recordings were confined to the ventral half of the retina, where cones were selectively stimulated with 385 nm light and rods with 520 nm light.

Results: In adult retina, both On and Off spiking responses were directionally selective (DS) to both cone and rod stimulation. Interestingly, we found that the Off responses for s-cone mediated DS were more poorly tuned than On responses, while the Off responses for rod mediate DS were similarly tuned to the On responses. Voltage clamp recordings showed also that inhibitory inputs to DSGCs were also directionally tuned, while excitatory inputs had equal amplitude for motion in all directions. The rod and cone mediated DS responses had different developmental time courses. Prior to eye opening (postnatal day 11), while the ON responses were tuned for both rod and cone stimulation, there was a significant difference in tuning for Off pathways. Notably only 20% of the DSGCs exhibited directional tuning in their Off response to cone stimulation while 80% of the DSGCs exhibited directional tuning in their Off response to rod stimulation. The decreased DS tuning in the cone pathway was due to an increased action potential firing to null-side stimulation.

Conclusions: Our data indicate that direction selectivity is computed for both rod and cone pathways, albeit via distinct circuits. The Off channel represents an important point of divergence between cone and rod-pathway both in its strength of tuning and developmental time course. These data indicate that the retina uses multiple strategies for computing DS responses across different stimulus conditions.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.