June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Reproducibility and reliability of intraretinal layer thickness measurements in mice using optical coherence tomography
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andrés Cruz-Herranz
    Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Philipp Albrecht
    Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Hao Yiu
    Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Lisanne Balk
    VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Ari Green
    Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Andrés Cruz-Herranz, None; Philipp Albrecht, None; Hao Yiu, None; Lisanne Balk, None; Ari Green, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 5916. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrés Cruz-Herranz, Philipp Albrecht, Hao Yiu, Lisanne Balk, Ari Green; Reproducibility and reliability of intraretinal layer thickness measurements in mice using optical coherence tomography . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):5916.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows in vivo measurements retinal layers. However, the utilization of OCT for tracking retinal degeneration in mice has been challenged because of the absence of data regarding test-retest reliability for the parameters measured. As opposed to histology, OCT offers the opportunity to perform longitudinal measures. We aimed to identify the most suitable scan protocols for the quantitative analysis of the retinal layers in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in mice.

 
Methods
 

Retinal images from 10 C57BL/6 mice were obtained using spectral domain (SD)-OCT (Heidelberg Spectralis). We performed raster based volume, peripapillary ring, and horizontal and vertical line scans with semi-automated segmentation of retinal layers to analyze the retest reliability of consecutive measurements. Independent investigators performed semi-automated segmentation to assess inter-rater reliability.

 
Results
 

We obtained the best reproducibility with retinal layer thickness measurements from consecutive volume scans (interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 95% confidence interval (CI), total retinal thickness: 0.96, 0.83-0.99; retinal nerve fiber layer: 0.81, 0.04-0.96; ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer: 0.94, 0.75-0.99; inner nuclear layer: 0.81, 0.16-0.96; outer plexiform layer: 0.61, -0.33-0.91; outer nuclear layer: 0.96, 0.83-0.99; photoreceptor layer: 0.93, 0.64-0.99). Peripapillary ring scans showed the poorest reliability and reproducibility. The inner retinal layers showed more inter-rater reliability (0.995, 0.989-0.998) and reproducibility (0.94, 0.73-0.99) than the outer retinal layers.

 
Conclusions
 

Our data suggest that among the different scan protocols, volume scans are most suitable to assess the thickness of the different retinal layers. The measurement of inner retinal layers thickness showed better reliability and reproducibility than the deeper retinal layers. These data indicate that OCT reliability is dependent on the scan protocols selected and that particular scan protocols in mice show promise for monitoring longitudinally.  

 

 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×