June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Attitudes and knowledge towards corneal donation in a population-based sample of urban Chinese adults
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xiuqin Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Division of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, China
  • Ling Jin
    State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Division of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Haid Garrett
    SightLife, Seattle, WA
  • Jeremy Shuman
    SightLife, Seattle, WA
  • Tim Schottman
    SightLife, Seattle, WA
  • Tingting Chen
    State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Division of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Jun Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Division of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Congyao Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Division of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • Nathan G Congdon
    State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Division of Preventive Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Orbis International, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Xiuqin Wang, None; Ling Jin, None; Haid Garrett, None; Jeremy Shuman, None; Tim Schottman, None; Tingting Chen, None; Jun Wang, None; Congyao Wang, None; Nathan Congdon, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 6201. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiuqin Wang, Ling Jin, Haid Garrett, Jeremy Shuman, Tim Schottman, Tingting Chen, Jun Wang, Congyao Wang, Nathan G Congdon; Attitudes and knowledge towards corneal donation in a population-based sample of urban Chinese adults. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):6201.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Some 350,000 patients require corneal transplants each year in China, but a severe shortage of donated corneas limits the number of surgeries. We sought to better understand knowledge, attitudes and barriers towards donation among urban Chinese adults.

Methods: Twelve communities were randomly selected from 3 of the 9 municipal districts composing Guangzhou city in southern China. Government residency registers were used to select individuals at random until > 35 respondents in pre-determined age strata from 20 to 60+ years had completed a 36-item, 20-minute questionnaire administered by trained study personnel at their home.

Results: Among 1,217 randomly-selected persons, 430 (35.3%) completed the survey (mean [SD] age 40.4 [15.6] years, n=249 [57.9%] female). Refusers were older (44.8 [13.8] years, p<0.001), but did not differ by gender (52.2% female, P=0.06) from participants. Among participants, 175 (40.7%) would be willing to donate corneas (WTD). Differences between those WTD and not WTD included: greater knowledge about donation (WTD knowledge score 6.91 +/- 2.21, not WTD 5.62 +/- 2.43, p<0.001); having ever discussed donation (WTD n=46 [26.3%], not WTD n=22 [8.63%], p<0.001); viewing donation as “unpopular” in society (WTD n=119 [68.0%], not WTD n=208 [81.6%], p=0.001); feeling that donation “damages the body” (WTD n=27 [15.4%], not WTD n=65 [25.7%], p<0.001); “unlikely” to talk about donation (WTD n=46 [26.3%], not WTD n=196 [77.8%], p<0.001); and “unlikely” to consent to donation of a relative’s cornea (WTD n=22 [12.6%], not WTD n=124 [49.0%], p<0.001). In logistic regression models of WTD, the following remained significant: Knowledge (WTD OR=1.17 per point, 95% CI 1.05, 1.31, P =0.004), having discussed donation (WTD OR=2.28, 95% CI 1.13, 4.60, p=0.021); viewing donation as “unpopular” (WTD OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.12, 0.82, p=0.019); and disagreeing that donation damages the body (WTD OR= 3.51, 95% CI 1.86, 6.61, P<0.001). Attitudes toward donation, and WTD (>60 years: 22/51, 43.1%; <=40 years: 99/241, 41.1%, p=0.96) did not differ by age.

Conclusions: Even assuming all those refusing the survey would not donate, 14.3% (175/1217) agreed to, sufficient to sustain transplant programs. Interventions to improve knowledge about the process may be most likely to increase donation. Neither attitudes nor willingness to donate differed significantly between younger and old persons.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×