June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Development and Delivery of Candidate Retinoblastoma Therapeutics
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eleanor M Pritchard
    Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
    Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Rachel Brennan
    Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Lyra Griffiths
    Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Elizabeth Stewart
    Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Cori Bradley
    Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Burgess B Freeman
    Preclinical Pharmacokinetics Shared Resource,, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • William Caufield
    Preclinical Pharmacokinetics Shared Resource,, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Michael A Dyer
    Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN
  • R Kiplin Guy
    Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Eleanor Pritchard, None; Rachel Brennan, None; Lyra Griffiths, None; Elizabeth Stewart, None; Cori Bradley, None; Burgess Freeman, None; William Caufield, None; Michael Dyer, None; R Guy, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 83. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eleanor M Pritchard, Rachel Brennan, Lyra Griffiths, Elizabeth Stewart, Cori Bradley, Burgess B Freeman, William Caufield, Michael A Dyer, R Kiplin Guy; Development and Delivery of Candidate Retinoblastoma Therapeutics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):83.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: While mortality is low with aggressive multimodal therapy, partial or full loss of vision occurs in approximately 50% of patients with advanced bilateral retinoblastoma. There is an urgent need to develop targeted therapies that preserve vision and reduce late effects of current treatment modalities, which include facial malformations and increased incidence of secondary malignancies. Candidate therapeutics should ideally (1) completely clear disease to prevent progression and metastasis, (2) be well tolerated locally to preserve vision, and (3) act quickly to overcome rapid clearance from the eye. Phase I and II clinical trials for retinoblastoma are difficult due to the young age of the patient population and relative rarity of the disease. Therefore robust preclinical testing of new therapies is critical.

Methods: To meet this need, we conducted library screening of approximately 300 compounds using focused libraries from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (SJCRH) chemical collection to determine in vitro potency in retinoblastoma cell lines (RB355, Weri, and Y79) and a normal human fibroblast control cell line (BJ). Further in vitro testing was conducted to prioritize “hits” (compounds active in retinoblastoma cells, but not BJ cells). For lead compounds, we determined speed of effect with washout studies and cidality with outgrowth studies. Synergy testing was performed to eliminate candidates with antagonistic interactions with current standard of care retinoblastoma drugs and prioritize any with strong agonism. We characterized pharmacokinetics (PK) to compare intraocular exposure for different routes of delivery (local and systemic) for high priority candidates.

Results: Screening identified several candidates to advance to the preclinical testing phase, including histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors and FDA-approved oncology drugs that might be repurposed for ocular use with local delivery methods. Consistent with treatment goals and the unique constraints of reaching an intraocular target, we prioritized HDAC inhibitors with rapid, cidal, potent and selective effects on retinoblastoma cells in vitro.

Conclusions: In vitro and PK testing suggest local delivery of HDAC inhibitors represents a promising potential targeted therapy for retinoblastoma. Next steps will include toxicity and efficacy testing in preclinical animal models of retinoblastoma.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×