June 2015
Volume 56, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2015
Operability of rebound tonometers designed for self-measurement of intraocular pressure
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Natasa Mihailovic
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
  • Julia Termuehlen
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
  • Nicole Eter
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
  • Thomas Dietlein
    University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Andre Rosentreter
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Natasa Mihailovic, None; Julia Termuehlen, None; Nicole Eter, None; Thomas Dietlein, None; Andre Rosentreter, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2015, Vol.56, 98. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Natasa Mihailovic, Julia Termuehlen, Nicole Eter, Thomas Dietlein, Andre Rosentreter; Operability of rebound tonometers designed for self-measurement of intraocular pressure. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56(7 ):98.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the operability of two rebound tonometers, which are designed for self-measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in a clinical setting by untrained persons.

Methods: After self-measurement of IOP with two rebound tonometers (iCare ONE and iCare HOME) probands were asked to complete a questionnaire containing different subitems concerning operability using a visual analog scale (1 = very good, 5 = very poor). Moreover, the feasibility and duration of measurement were tested.

Results: Sixty-four probands participated in this study. The mean of general operability was 2.72 ± 0.95 for the iCare ONE and 1.84 ± 0.96 for the iCare HOME (p < 0.001). The evaluation of the subitems sense of safety (iCare ONE: 2.77 ± 0.96; iCare HOME: 1.86 ± 0.77; p < 0.001) and comfort of measurement (iCare ONE: 2.06 ± 1.02; iCare HOME: 1.66 ± 0.62; p = 0.04) also showed a significant discrepancy between the two tonometers. Probands needed significantly less time for a single, valid measurement when using the iCare HOME tonometer (45.05 ± 42.66 seconds) compared to the iCare ONE tonometer (62.75 ± 52.19 seconds; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Both, the iCare ONE tonometer and the iCare HOME tonometer, obtained a satisfactory evaluation in terms of operability. However, the iCare HOME received a significantly better evaluation for all subitems and also showed a significant shorter duration of measurement when used by untrained persons. Hence, the iCare HOME seems to be a more suitable instrument for self-measurement of IOP.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×