March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Wavefront and Pupil Dependence of Refractive Differences in Bright and Dim Environments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • George A. Zikos
    Institute for Vision Research,
    Manhattan Vision Associates, New York, New York
  • Amitava Gupta
    PixelOptics, Inc., Roanoke, Virginia
  • Rocco Robilotto
    Institute for Vision Research,
    Manhattan Vision Associates, New York, New York
  • Ronald Blum
    PixelOptics, Inc., Roanoke, Virginia
  • Arkady Selenow
    Institute for Vision Research,
    Manhattan Vision Associates, New York, New York
  • Steven R. Ali
    Inst of Vision Research,
    Manhattan Vision Associates, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  George A. Zikos, PixelOptics, Inc. (F); Amitava Gupta, PixelOptics, Inc. (F); Rocco Robilotto, Pixel Optics (F); Ronald Blum, Pixel Optics (F); Arkady Selenow, Pixel Optics, inc (F); Steven R. Ali, Pixel Optics, Inc. (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Pixel Optics, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 142. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      George A. Zikos, Amitava Gupta, Rocco Robilotto, Ronald Blum, Arkady Selenow, Steven R. Ali; Wavefront and Pupil Dependence of Refractive Differences in Bright and Dim Environments. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):142.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the refractive differences in high and low illuminance environments

Methods: : Visual acuity defocus curves were measured in 9 subjects under bright (1300Lux) and dim (0.3Lux) conditions using the CoViTS software using a reverse contrast tumbling E with crowding bars 4AFC staircase method. Pupil size was monitored during testing using an RK-726PCI ISCAN eye tracker. Wavefront aberration was measured using a COAS sensor in similar lighting conditions.

Results: : To evaluate the difference in refraction the difference in the defocus curve peaks was calculated. Three subjects exhibited myopic shifts (0.25 - 0.50D), four hyperopic (0.25 - 0.50D) and two had no shift. These differences exhibited a weak correlation (r^2=0.44) to LSA measured under dim conditions and the difference of the best fit sphere between the two conditions (r^2=0.34). Mean pupil difference during the defocus curve evaluation was 2.2 mm ±0.8 (1.3 - 3.6), similar to the difference measured during wavefront measurement 2.2 mm ±0.7 (1.2 - 3.3).

Conclusions: : Patient’s refractions can differ significantly under different illumination conditions. This difference may be partially accounted for by subject’s spherical aberration.

Keywords: refraction • aberrations • pupil 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×