March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Are We Wasting Tissue for DSAEK?: Viability Staining of Pre-Cut Tissue Deemed Unsuitable via Slit-Lamp and Specular Microscopy Exam
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jeffrey D. Holiman
    Lions VisionGift, Portland, Oregon
  • Christopher Stoeger
    Lions VisionGift, Portland, Oregon
  • David Davis-Boozer
    Devers Eye Institute,
    Lions VisionGift, Portland, Oregon
  • Mark A. Terry
    Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Jeffrey D. Holiman, None; Christopher Stoeger, None; David Davis-Boozer, None; Mark A. Terry, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 26. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jeffrey D. Holiman, Christopher Stoeger, David Davis-Boozer, Mark A. Terry; Are We Wasting Tissue for DSAEK?: Viability Staining of Pre-Cut Tissue Deemed Unsuitable via Slit-Lamp and Specular Microscopy Exam. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):26.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To quantitatively assess through calcein AM staining the endothelial cell damage to pre-cut corneal grafts deemed unsuitable by standard eye bank techniques of slit lamp and specular microscopy

Methods: : Specular and slit-lamp microscopies were utilized to determine suitability for EK preparation and subsequent transplantation according to Eye Bank Association of America standards. These evaluations were preformed on corneas pre and post EK preparation with a microkeratome. During the time period of October 2011 to November 2011 there were two corneas that were deemed not suitable for transplantation due to difficulty visualizing cells and atypical appearance of cell morphology upon specular and slit-lamp exam. The unsuitable corneas and a sampling of suitable corneas (n=6) were trephinated and stained with calcein AM, images were captured with florescent microscope and endothelial cell loss (ECL) was calculated using Adobe Photoshop. Mean ECL was compared between groups using Mann Whitney U-test in SPSS v. 19.

Results: : Cell viability staining demonstrated 10% ECL at an average of 5 days post-processing for tissues deemed unsuitable for transplantation compared to 13% ECL in the control group sample. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.505).

Conclusions: : We have demonstrated that grafts deemed unsuitable by traditional methods of exclusion (specular and slit lamp evaluation) may have minimal endothelial cell damage and could still be used for transplantation. Viability staining of the entire graft after processing could be helpful in determining suitability for transplantation and avoid unnecessary tissue wastage. Further investigations regarding long-term viability of this endothelium with atypical appearance upon slit-lamp and specular microscopy is warranted.

Keywords: cornea: endothelium • transplantation • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×