March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison of Busin glide insertion technique vs. a direct needle insertion technique in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Amir Pirouzian
    Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, UCI, Irvine, California
  • Matthew Wade
    UC Irvine, Irvine, California
  • Roger F. Steinert
    Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, Irvine, California
  • Marjan Farid
    Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, UCI, Irvine, California
  • sumit Garg
    Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, UCI, Irvine, California
  • S Lance Forstot
    Cornea Consultants of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
  • Ronald N. Gaster
    Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, UCI, Irvine, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Amir Pirouzian, None; Matthew Wade, None; Roger F. Steinert, None; Marjan Farid, None; sumit Garg, None; S Lance Forstot, None; Ronald N. Gaster, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 38. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amir Pirouzian, Matthew Wade, Roger F. Steinert, Marjan Farid, sumit Garg, S Lance Forstot, Ronald N. Gaster; Comparison of Busin glide insertion technique vs. a direct needle insertion technique in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):38.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To report the visual outcome parameters including endothelial cell densities between Busin glide insertion technique vs. direct needle insertion technique for inserting the donor corneal lenticule in Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

Methods: : Retrospective case series review. We compared the records of fifteen patients having undergone the direct needle insertion technique vs. 40 patients having undergone Busin glide insertion technique in DSAEK surgery over the past 18-months. Outcome measures of pre/postoperative visual acuity, endothelial cell density (ECD), refractive error and complication events will be reported.

Results: : Preliminary results indicate mean ECD loss of 18% at one year following the needle insertion tecnique and 22% for the Busin glide technique. Mean pre-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in both groups improved from 2.0+/-1.0LogMAR to postoperative mean BCVA 0.30+/-0.10LogMAR. Final statistical results will be presented.

Conclusions: : In comparing between Busin glide insertion technique with the direct needle insertion technique in DSAEK, the one year ECD loss is comparable and these results are similar to the other previously reported DSAEK insertion techniques. The direct needle insertion technique is simple, cost-effective and fast.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • cornea: endothelium • cornea: stroma and keratocytes 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×