March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Refractive Change After Combined Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty, Cataract Extraction, And Intraocular Lens Implantation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hans D. Hertzog
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • Ramya Swamy, MD, MPH
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • Omar Chaudhary, MD
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • Neda Shamie, MD
    Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Hans D. Hertzog, None; Ramya Swamy, MD, MPH, None; Omar Chaudhary, MD, None; Neda Shamie, MD, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 59. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hans D. Hertzog, Ramya Swamy, MD, MPH, Omar Chaudhary, MD, Neda Shamie, MD; Refractive Change After Combined Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty, Cataract Extraction, And Intraocular Lens Implantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):59.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) alone has been shown to cause minimal refractive change. However, refractive change in combined DMEK, cataract extraction (CE), and posterior capsule intraocular lens implantation (PCIOL) procedures has not been previously examined.

Methods: : Medical records of patients who had undergone combined DMEK, CE, and PCIOL were reviewed retrospectively. Pre-operative target refraction was compared to post-operative refraction at least 6 weeks after undergoing the procedure.

Results: : Three patients underwent combined DMEK, CE, and PCIOL extraction performed by the same surgeon using a temporal scleral tunnel approach. All 3 patients had Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Pre-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/30 to 20/150. Post operative BCVA was 20/25 to 20/30. All patients received a 1 piece IOL targeting a spherical equivalent of -1 D. The average post-operative refraction was +0.125 D (SD = 0.98) which demonstrated a hyperopic shift of 1.125 D.

Conclusions: : This case series demonstrates that patients who have undergone combined DMEK/ CE/PCIOL procedures can have excellent visual outcomes. This case series demonstrates the refractive change may vary based on the individual patient but a -1 D target for implanted IOLs may be most appropriate. Additional studies are needed in order to develop accurate IOL power nomograms for patients undergoing combined DMEK/ CE/ PCIOL procedures.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×