March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Contrast Sensitivity After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michael Rudolph
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Kathrin Laaser
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Bjoern O. Bachmann
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Claus Cursiefen
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Stephan Riss
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Friedrich E. Kruse
    Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Michael Rudolph, None; Kathrin Laaser, None; Bjoern O. Bachmann, None; Claus Cursiefen, None; Stephan Riss, None; Friedrich E. Kruse, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 63. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael Rudolph, Kathrin Laaser, Bjoern O. Bachmann, Claus Cursiefen, Stephan Riss, Friedrich E. Kruse; Contrast Sensitivity After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):63.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), a lamellar technique for sole replacement of the endothelium-Descemet’s membrane layer (EDM), is currently replacing penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for selective treatment of diseases of corneal endothelial cells. In most studies visual acuity serves as the major outcome measure. However since glare is the leading complaint of patients with Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy we retrospectively investigated contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients after DMEK in comparison to controls.

 
Methods:
 

13 patients who underwent DMEK with a standardized approach were analyzed by the Optec 6500P contrast sensitivity tester. Test conditions included photopic illumination (85cd/m²), photopic illumination with 10 Lux glare, mesopic illumination (3cd/m²) and mesopic illumination with 1 Lux glare. Data was compared with 31 patients who had undergone cataract extraction via phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation. Patients were examined 6.29 ± 0.94 months after DMEK and 11.77 ± 2.19 months after PCIOL implantation.

 
Results:
 

Mean age was 52.7 ± 17.9 in DMEK group and 72.0 ± 9.3 in PCIOL group (p=0.007). Contrast sensitivity values are given in table 1. Mean values for 1.5 cycles per degree (cpd) showed significant differences between both groups under photopic illumination (p=0.01) and photopic illumination with glare (p=0.044). There were no significant differences for 3, 6, 12 and 18 cpd. When comparing mean contrast sensitivity values between DMEK and control group there were no statistically significant differences under mesopic conditions.

 
Conclusions:
 

In an earlier report we have shown that DMEK (in contrast to DSAEK) renders nearly normal postoperative higher order aberrations 6 months after surgery. Here we demonstrate that DMEK renders normal contrast sensitivity values at the same time. These results seem to explain the favorable visual function after DMEK.  

 
Keywords: cornea: endothelium • contrast sensitivity • transplantation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×