March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison Of Blood Retinal Flow In Severe Diabetic Retinopathy Treated With Panretinal Photocoagulation Performed With A Pattern Scan Laser Versus A Conventional Laser
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sho Watarai
    Department of Opthalmology, NTT East Japan Tohoku Hospital, Sendai, Japan
  • Shinji Onodera
    Department of Opthalmology, NTT East Japan Tohoku Hospital, Sendai, Japan
  • Kanako Yasuda
    Department of Opthalmology, NTT East Japan Tohoku Hospital, Sendai, Japan
  • Masayuki Yasuda
    Ophthalmology, Tohoku Univ Grad School of Med, Aoba-ku, Japan
  • Toru Nakazawa
    Ophthalmology, Tohoku Univ Grad School of Med, Aoba-ku, Japan
  • Masahiko Shimura
    Department of Opthalmology, NTT East Japan Tohoku Hospital, Sendai, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Sho Watarai, None; Shinji Onodera, None; Kanako Yasuda, None; Masayuki Yasuda, None; Toru Nakazawa, None; Masahiko Shimura, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 376. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sho Watarai, Shinji Onodera, Kanako Yasuda, Masayuki Yasuda, Toru Nakazawa, Masahiko Shimura; Comparison Of Blood Retinal Flow In Severe Diabetic Retinopathy Treated With Panretinal Photocoagulation Performed With A Pattern Scan Laser Versus A Conventional Laser. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):376.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : In patients with diabetic retinopathy, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is performed to treat retinal ischemia. PRP, however, causes a reduction of blood flow, which is an undesirable side effect. A pattern scan laser (PSL) uses a shorter pulse duration of spots which reduces collateral damage and thus the adverse effects of PRP. This study compares retinal blood flow and visual function in severe diabetic retinopathy following PRP using either a PSL or a conventional laser (CVL).

Methods: : Ten patients with diabetic retinopathy in both eyes underwent PRP using a PSL (2 sessions/ ≈3000 spots) in one eye, and PRP using a CVL (3 sessions/ ≈2000 spots) in the other eye. Retinal blood flow was assessed with mean blur rate (MBR) measured by laser speckle flowgraphy of the optic disc once a month for 6 months. Central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) using a logMAR chart was also evaluated.

Results: : MBR was decreased during PRP in both the eyes treated with a PSL (73.2±6.9%) and the eyes treated with a CVL (71.5±8.0%). There was no significant difference between the two groups. After completion of PRP, the MBR in the eyes treated with a PSL improved and was 89.4±8.3% at 6 months. The MBR in the eyes treated with a CVL was unchanged (70.3±9.6% at 6 months: p<0.01). Both CMT and VA in the eyes treated with a PSL were unchanged during the clinical course, while those parameters in the eyes treated with a CVL worsened over time.

Conclusions: : Compared to a CVL, PRP with a PSL resulted in rapid recovery of blood retinal flow after the completion of PRP, and had less influence on macular function in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy • laser • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×