March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Oral Azithromycin for the Treatment of Meibomitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jonathan B. Greene
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Todd P. Margolis
    F I Proctor Foundation, Univ of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Robert Fintelmann
    Barnet-Dulaney-Perkins Eye Center, Phoenix, Arizona
  • Bennie H. Jeng
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Jonathan B. Greene, None; Todd P. Margolis, None; Robert Fintelmann, None; Bennie H. Jeng, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 606. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jonathan B. Greene, Todd P. Margolis, Robert Fintelmann, Bennie H. Jeng; Oral Azithromycin for the Treatment of Meibomitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):606.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

Despite its robust antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, favorable ocular pharmacokinetics, and relatively safe side-effect profile, oral azithromycin has not been systematically evaluated for the treatment of meibomitis. This study was designed to evaluate for symptomatic improvement after treatment with oral azithromycin in patients with meibomitis who have failed traditional treatments.

 
Methods:
 

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with meibomitis recalcitrant to standard treatment modalities who were given oral azithromycin (1 gram orally once per week for 3 weeks) as part of their treatment regimen. Data recorded included patient demographics, prior failed treatments, concurrent treatments, subjective improvement after azithromycin treatment, and reported adverse effects.

 
Results:
 

A total of 32 patients with meibomitis underwent treatment with oral azithromycin. Seventy-five percent (75%) of patients receiving oral azithromycin reported improvement in their symptoms at follow-up (average time to follow-up 5.6 weeks). Though all patients received concurrent steroid therapy, when controlling for those who had previously failed steroids, 64% still reported improvement. No significant adverse effects attributable to azithromycin were reported.

 
Conclusions:
 

Oral azithromycin may be a useful therapy for treating meibomitis, particularly in patients who have failed traditional therapies. We propose that its well documented anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties contribute to this effect, and azithromycin’s ocular pharmacokinetics allow for a much simpler and shorter dosing regimen than other frequently used medications. Further investigation is warranted.

 
Keywords: inflammation • antibiotics/antifungals/antiparasitics • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×