March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Agreement Among Graders on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Topographic Change Analysis (TCA) Glaucoma Progression Interpretation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michele M. Iester
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Eye Clinic, DiNOG, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
  • Gadi Wollstein
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Richard A. Bilonick
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Dept. of Biostatistics, Univ of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Juan Xu
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Jessica Nevins
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Hiroshi Ishikawa
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Dept. Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, U. Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Larry Kagemann
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Dept. Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, U. Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Joel S. Schuman
    UPMC Eye Center, Univ of Pittsburgh Sch of Med, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Dept. Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, U. Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Michele M. Iester, None; Gadi Wollstein, None; Richard A. Bilonick, None; Juan Xu, None; Jessica Nevins, None; Hiroshi Ishikawa, None; Larry Kagemann, None; Joel S. Schuman, Carl Zeiss Meditec (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH R01-EY013178, NIH R01-EY013516, P30-EY008098; Eye and Ear Foundation (Pittsburgh, PA); Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 654. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michele M. Iester, Gadi Wollstein, Richard A. Bilonick, Juan Xu, Jessica Nevins, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Larry Kagemann, Joel S. Schuman; Agreement Among Graders on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Topographic Change Analysis (TCA) Glaucoma Progression Interpretation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):654.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

HRT TCA reports the topographic change from baseline in the optic disc (ONH) and the peripapillary area. The purpose of this study was to evaluate agreement among 3 glaucoma experts of TCA printout interpretations of glaucoma progression and explore methods for improving agreement.

 
Methods:
 

100 eyes of glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and healthy subjects with ≥5 visits and 2 good quality HRT scans acquired at each visit were enrolled to this study. Three experts independently graded randomly ordered TCA printouts as progressors or non-progressors. Each grader was presented with 2 sets of tests: a randomly selected single test from each visit and both tests from each visit. Furthermore, the TCA printouts were classified with and without pre-defined criteria. The criteria were: changes should be considered if reproducibly occurring within the ONH, while disregarding changes along blood vessels or at steep rim locations. Sign of image distortion (alternating red and green pixels) should be graded with caution. The agreement was modeled using common latent factor measurement error structural equation models for ordinal data.

 
Results:
 

Plots showing the probability of declaring progression were constructed for each expert (Figure). A shallower slope indicates lower precision of the assessment and a lower intercept indicates higher probability of classifying a subject as progressing. Assessing 2 scans per visit without using the pre-defined criteria produced significant differences in slope and intercept among the 3 experts. The agreement improved when only one scan per visit without criteria was used with significant difference still present among the experts. However, when the pre-defined criteria were used, no significant difference was noted for either slope or intercept for any of combination of experts.

 
Conclusions:
 

Using a set of simple pre-defined criteria substantially improved agreement among experts in assessing TCA progression while using additional tests in each visit did not improve agreement.  

 
Keywords: imaging/image analysis: clinical • optic disc 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×