March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Analysis of Long-Term Damage Progression in Glaucoma: Comparison between Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II) and Visual Field Indices
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Marco Pieri
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Elia Rigolli
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Maria Grazia Tardini
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Giacomo Bacchi
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Maria Francesca Giacosa
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Nicola Ungaro
    Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Stefano A. Gandolfi
    Ophthalmology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Marco Pieri, None; Elia Rigolli, None; Maria Grazia Tardini, None; Giacomo Bacchi, None; Maria Francesca Giacosa, None; Nicola Ungaro, None; Stefano A. Gandolfi, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 711. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marco Pieri, Elia Rigolli, Maria Grazia Tardini, Giacomo Bacchi, Maria Francesca Giacosa, Nicola Ungaro, Stefano A. Gandolfi; Analysis of Long-Term Damage Progression in Glaucoma: Comparison between Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II) and Visual Field Indices. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):711.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

to evaluate the relationship between Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II) and perimetry in determining the progression in glaucoma.

 
Methods:
 

data were obtained from the Glaucoma Management System 3 database of our Glaucoma clinic. We included patients with a diagnosis of open angle glaucoma and reliable HRT II and automated perimetry examinations (Humphrey SITA or full threshold strategy). The following parameters were examined: for HRT rim area (RA) and cup shape measure (CSM), for visual field (VF) the stage of the disease following Brusini’s Glaucoma Staging System 2 (GSS2), mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Patients were included if they had GSS2 ≥ 0.5 at baseline, at least 4 years of follow-up and a minimum of 3 exams for both HRT and VF.

 
Results:
 

58 eyes were eligible for analysis. The mean follow-up was 5.14 years, the mean number of VF was 6.31 and the mean number of HRT was 4.52. Results are summarized in Table 1.

 
Conclusions:
 

a significative reduction over time of global HRT indices (RA and CSM) was paralleled by a significative increase of GSS2 and PSD; MD didn’t show a significative variation at the end of the follow-up, possibly related to these reasons: 1) small sample size, 2) low sensitivity of HRT in evaluating the optic nerve head changes in advanced glaucoma and 3) low sensitivity of MD as a worsening index in the first phases of the disease. Further studies on a larger population are needed to confirm these findings.  

 
Keywords: optic nerve • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×