April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
The Risk Of Single-dose Topical Anesthesia Bottle/Tube Contamination Prior To Intravitreal Injection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hussein Wafapoor
    Ophthalmology,
    Retina Health Center, Fort Myers, Florida
  • Alexander M. Eaton
    Retina Health Center, Fort Myers, Florida
  • Sabrina Prabakaran
    Ophthalmology,
    Retina Health Center, Fort Myers, Florida
  • Samantha Prabakaran
    Ophthalmology,
    Retina Health Center, Fort Myers, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Hussein Wafapoor, None; Alexander M. Eaton, None; Sabrina Prabakaran, None; Samantha Prabakaran, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 131. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hussein Wafapoor, Alexander M. Eaton, Sabrina Prabakaran, Samantha Prabakaran; The Risk Of Single-dose Topical Anesthesia Bottle/Tube Contamination Prior To Intravitreal Injection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):131.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the safety of using single unit dose topical anesthetic eye drops versus single use Lidocaine gel prior to intravitreal injection.

Methods: : The contents from 60 consecutive bottles of Tetracaine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% Viscous Sterile Solution were cultured after use for topical anesthesia prior to intravitreal injections. Next, the contents from 52 consecutive tubes of Lidocaine Hydrochloride gel, USP 2% were cultured after using these in patients for topical anesthesia prior to intravitreal injections. The length of time the tube/bottle was open, and the number of patients anaesthetized, was evaluated.

Results: : No growth was found in any of the 60 bottles of the Tetracaine drops; however, 7 of the Lidocaine gel tubes were culture-positive; six for coagulase negative staphylococci and one for Klebsiella oxytoca. None of the patients with the culture positive tubes developed endophthalmitis. The drops were open 1-19 days, and 386 patients were anaesthetized. The Lidocaine gel was open 1-44 days, and 209 patients were anaesthetized.

Conclusions: : The use of preservative-free 2% Lidocaine gel may increase the risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection as a result of anesthetic contamination, whereas the use of preserved single unit dose topical tetracaine anesthetic drops in multiple patients did not result in infectious contamination of the drops.

Keywords: macula/fovea • age-related macular degeneration • injection 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×