April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Effects Of Latanoprost Versus Travoprost With Sofzia On The Ocular Surface Of Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shelly R. Gupta
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Jonathan S. Myers
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Cristobal C. Cruz
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Tania Tai
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Sheryl S. Wizov
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Marlene R. Moster
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Michael J. Pro
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Christopher J. Rapuano
    Cornea,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • John R. Wittpenn
    Cornea, Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Stony Brook, New York
  • L. J. Katz
    Glaucoma,
    Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Shelly R. Gupta, None; Jonathan S. Myers, Alcon, Allergan (R), Alcon, Allergan, Inotek, Merck, Pfizer (F), Alcon, Allergan, Inotek, Pfizer (C); Cristobal C. Cruz, None; Tania Tai, None; Sheryl S. Wizov, None; Marlene R. Moster, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (F, C, R), Allergan Inc. (F, C, R), BD Medical-Ophthalmic Systems (C), Genentech (F), IOP Inc. (F), iScience (C, R), Ista Pharmaceuticals (R), Pfizer, Inc. (F, R); Michael J. Pro, Genentech (F); Christopher J. Rapuano, Alcon, Inc. (R), Allergan, Inc. (C, R), Bausch and Lomb (C, R), EyeGate Pharma (C), Inspire Pharmaceuticals (C, R), RPS (I), Vistakon (R); John R. Wittpenn, Allergan, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc; Inspire Pharmaceuticals; Bausch and Lomb (R); L. J. Katz, Allergan Inc.; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; Heidelberg (R), Allergan, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; Glaukos; Merck; Heidelberg (F), Glaukos; Allergan, Inc.; Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Pfizer
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 229. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shelly R. Gupta, Jonathan S. Myers, Cristobal C. Cruz, Tania Tai, Sheryl S. Wizov, Marlene R. Moster, Michael J. Pro, Christopher J. Rapuano, John R. Wittpenn, L. J. Katz; Effects Of Latanoprost Versus Travoprost With Sofzia On The Ocular Surface Of Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):229.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To quantify ocular surface changes in patients using latanoprost and travoprost with sofZia.

Methods: : Prospective, single center, observational cohort study with masked examiner. Patients were classified into 2 groups. Group 1 was naïve to glaucoma therapy. Group 2 had been using latanoprost in both eyes for a least one month. Both groups were instructed to start (or continue) latanoprost in right eye, and to start travoprost with sofZia in left eye. At baseline, month 1, and month 2, measurements of tear break up time, corneal staining, conjunctival hyperemia, lissamine green vital staining, Schirmer testing of tear production, intraocular pressure, visual acuity, patient drug preference, and impression cytology with cellular typing were obtained. Ocular Surface Disease Index was used to measure patient comfort.

Results: : 55 patients have been enrolled, 44 completed. Both Group 1 (n=26) and Group 2 (n=18) did not show any significant difference in tear break up time (p=0.60, 0.50), corneal staining (p=0.53, 1.00), conjunctival hyperemia (p=0.09, 0.51), lissamine green vital staining (p=0.93, 0.88), Schirmer testing (p=0.25, 0.13), intraocular pressure (p=0.64, 0.88), patient drug preference (p=0.86, 0.09), and impression cytology with cellular typing (p=0.16, 0.71). There were no significant differences between the eye receiving latanoprost or the eye receiving travoprost with sofZia for any outcome at any time. No significant differences were seen between Groups 1 and 2 with respect to treatment scores.

Conclusions: : Our study did not demonstrate a significant difference in the ocular surface effects of patients using latanoprost with BAK versus travoprost with SofZia.

Clinical Trial: : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov nct00798694

Keywords: drug toxicity/drug effects • ocular irritancy/toxicity testing • intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×