April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Sensitivity and Specificity of Frequency Doubling Perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix in the Detection of Homonymous Visual Field Defects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rajen U. Desai
    Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
  • Brian M. Enriquez
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
  • Amilia Schrier
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York
  • Peter D. Berg
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
  • Edward F. Smith
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Rajen U. Desai, None; Brian M. Enriquez, None; Amilia Schrier, None; Peter D. Berg, None; Edward F. Smith, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 260. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rajen U. Desai, Brian M. Enriquez, Amilia Schrier, Peter D. Berg, Edward F. Smith; Sensitivity and Specificity of Frequency Doubling Perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix in the Detection of Homonymous Visual Field Defects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):260.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the ability of Humphrey Matrix Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDT) to detect homonymous defects found on Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP).

Methods: : We studied 8 patients with homonymous defects: 3 with hemianopias and 5 with quadrantanopias. An involved quadrant was defined as at least 9 points of p < 0.5% in the pattern deviation of SAP, or the total deviation of FDT. Each quadrant was studied separately for each patient and compared to the corresponding quadrant on SAP.

Results: : Using our criteria, FDT Matrix provided a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 100% in detecting homonymous visual field defects.

Conclusions: : The newer FDT Matrix has the ability to detect homonymous field defects with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords: perimetry • neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×