April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Reduced Arrestin in the OS Slows Down Photoresponse Recovery in Rods
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Whitney M. Cleghorn
    Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Elviche Lenou
    Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Xiufeng Song
    Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy
    Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Jungwon Seo
    Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Eugenia V. Gurevich
    Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Vsevolod V. Gurevich
    Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Whitney M. Cleghorn, None; Elviche Lenou, None; Xiufeng Song, None; Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy, None; Jungwon Seo, None; Eugenia V. Gurevich, None; Vsevolod V. Gurevich, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH grants T32 EY07135 (WMC), RO1 EY11500 (VVG).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 32. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Whitney M. Cleghorn, Elviche Lenou, Xiufeng Song, Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy, Jungwon Seo, Eugenia V. Gurevich, Vsevolod V. Gurevich; Reduced Arrestin in the OS Slows Down Photoresponse Recovery in Rods. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):32.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine how arrestin availability affects the rate of recovery in rod photoreceptors.

Methods: : We used two-flash ERG to determine the rate of rod recovery in vivo.

Results: : Mice expressing arrestin at various levels: 4% (Tr-4Arr-/-), 12% (Tr-12Arr-/-), 50% (Arr+/-), and 100% of wild-type (WT), were tested by two-flash ERG with the first (desensitizing) flash at 160, 400, 1000, and 2500 photons/rod. The level of recovery was determined by the response to a probe flash of 4500 photons/rod delivered at variable intervals after the desensitizing flash. We showed that recovery in WT retinas progressively slows with increasing intensity of the initial flash. Time of half recovery is ~ 2.5-fold longer after the highest flash intensity (2500 photons/rod) than after the lowest (160 photons/rod). Mice expressing arrestin at 50% and 12% of the normal level were not statistically different from WT mice at any light intensity tested. Interestingly, the mice expressing the lowest level of arrestin (4%) had a dramatically slower recovery than the other three genotypes at all intensities. In these mice, the time of half recovery increased ~28 fold when tested with the highest flash intensity, in contrast to ~2.5 in other animals. Even after the dimmest desensitizing flash, the rate of recovery of Tr-4Arr-/- rods was two times slower than in other lines.

Conclusions: : Our data show that arrestin expression between 100% and 12% of WT is sufficient for rapid recovery at different light levels. Gradual slowing of recovery with increasing intensity of the first flash observed in Tr-12Arr-/-, Arr+/-, and WT animals becomes dramatic with limited arrestin in Tr-4Arr-/- mice. This suggests that there is a threshold of arrestin expression between 4% and 12% of WT for transition from near normal to abnormally slow photoresponse recovery.

Keywords: photoreceptors • electroretinography: non-clinical • protein structure/function 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×