April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Comparison Of The Biomechanics Of The Peripapillary And A Peripheral Sclera Ring
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sebastian A. Teucher
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
    University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Naim Terai
    Ophthalmology,
    University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Eberhard Spoerl
    Ophthalmology,
    University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Lutz E. Pillunat
    Dept of Ophthalmology,
    University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Sebastian A. Teucher, None; Naim Terai, None; Eberhard Spoerl, None; Lutz E. Pillunat, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 441. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sebastian A. Teucher, Naim Terai, Eberhard Spoerl, Lutz E. Pillunat; Comparison Of The Biomechanics Of The Peripapillary And A Peripheral Sclera Ring. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):441.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate the load and unload behaviour of the peripapillary sclera canal ring (scr) and a superiorly localized sclera ring (sps) in the porcine eye.

Methods: : Two sclera rings were trephined from each of 40 porcine eyes, one containing the sclera canal ring and the other a more superiorly localized sclera ring. The load and the unload curve were measured in the extension range of 0 to 2.0 mm by a biomaterial tester. Hysteresis was determined from the area enclosed by the loading and unloading curve.

Results: : At 1 mm extension the mean load of the scr was 0.89 ± 0.22 N and 1.13 ± 0.19 N in the sps which was not significantly different between both rings (P= 0.05). Mean hysteresis in the scr was 1.55 ± 0.30 N x mm and 1.90 ± 0.18 N x mm in the sps which was significantly different between both rings (P=0.01). Mean sclera thickness was 986 µm in the scr (range: 900 µm-1060 µm) and 971 µm in the sps (range: 800 µm -1200 µm) without a statistical significant difference between both sclera rings (P=0.78).

Conclusions: : Hysteresis in the scr was significantly lower than in the sps indicating a higher elasticity of the scr in the porcine eye. This effect could be explained by a higher content of elastin in the surrounding ring of the peripapillary optic nerve head providing reversible contraction in cases of IOP variations.

Keywords: sclera 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×