March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Outcomes of Combined Treatment with Ozurdex Implant and Grid Laser Photocoagulation for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ebru N. Cetin
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • Clayton Scanlon
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • Levent Akduman
    Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Ebru N. Cetin, None; Clayton Scanlon, None; Levent Akduman, Allergan (C, R)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 913. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ebru N. Cetin, Clayton Scanlon, Levent Akduman; Outcomes of Combined Treatment with Ozurdex Implant and Grid Laser Photocoagulation for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):913.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate the outcomes of combined treatment with Ozurdex implant and grid laser photocoagulation for macular edema (ME) in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: : Every patient with BRVO and ME was offered Ozurdex injection combined with grid laser photocoagulation upon initial approval and marketing of Ozurdex as long as the extent of intraretinal hemorrhages did not interfere with the laser application. This combination treatment has been repeated on as needed basis for Ozurdex and every 3-4 months for grid laser photocoagulation. The treatment regimen was changed only for untolerated side effect or poor efficacy.

Results: : Nine eyes were identified fulfilling this criteria. Follow up time was 8.8±5.8 (2-20) months. Initial visual acuity was 0.11±0.10 and improved to 0.16±0.16 at the final visit (p=0.176, wilcoxon). In OCT, average central foveal zone thickness was 542±160 and improved to 355±130 (p=0.05, wilcoxon). One patient had to be offered antiVEGF treatments for poor efficacy. None of the patients were switched to antiVEGF treatment due to untolerable increase in intraocular pressure or underwent cataract extraction during the follow up.

Conclusions: : Ozurdex plus grid laser treatment seems to be an effective combination therapy for the management of ME secondary to BRVO. Comparison of this therapy to Ozurdex or anti-VEGF alone or in combination with laser may help determine the most efficacious and safe treatment for the management of ME secondary to BRVO

Keywords: vascular occlusion/vascular occlusive disease • corticosteroids • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×