March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparison Of Automatic Fogging Methods To Minimize Instrument Accommodation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ron R. Rammage
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Daniel Neal
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • James Copland
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Thomas D. Neal
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Wei Xiong
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Steve Farrer
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Phillip Riera
    R & D, Abbott Medical Optics, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Ron R. Rammage, AMO (E); Daniel Neal, AMO (E); James Copland, AMO (E); Thomas D. Neal, AMO (E); Wei Xiong, AMO (E); Steve Farrer, AMO (E); Phillip Riera, AMO (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 1359. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ron R. Rammage, Daniel Neal, James Copland, Thomas D. Neal, Wei Xiong, Steve Farrer, Phillip Riera; Comparison Of Automatic Fogging Methods To Minimize Instrument Accommodation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):1359.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Instruments that include an algorithm for automatically determining refraction (auto-refractors, wavefront aberrometers), generally include a fogged internal fixation target so that the far-point refraction can be determined. The efectiveness of this fixation target directly impacts the accuracy of the instrument refraction (relative to manifest refraction) and the amount of instrument myopia.

Methods: : Using a research version of the iDesign combined Aberrometer/CT instrument, the fixation target presentation could be varied in a programmed sequence. A series of comparison clinical studies was conducted with different sequences and end points. The target was presented with varying defocus, but was not compensated for astigmatism.

Results: : Several factors were found to be important for effective fogging: fogging rate, total fogging amount, rest eye vergence position, and total fogging range. It was found that in subjects with large astigmatism (>2D), the fogging range needed to minimize instrument accommodation was greater, by an amount of ~C/2. In addition, single button sequences were as effective at minimizing accommodation as were two button sequences with some delay between autorefract and final acquisition. The target type, pattern or arrangement had a secondary effect on instrument accommodation.

Conclusions: : The target presentation sequence is critical for developing instruments to minimize accommodation. Target fixation must be changed at a speed that the human eye can track, and must have sufficient range so that all meridians are sufficiently fogged at the time of measurement.

Keywords: accommodation • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • aberrations 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×