March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Accommodation in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dayna S. Dalton
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Karen J. Cruickshanks
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Alex Pinto
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Barbara E. Klein
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Ronald Klein
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Guan-Hua Huang
    National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Dayna S. Dalton, None; Karen J. Cruickshanks, None; Alex Pinto, None; Barbara E. Klein, None; Ronald Klein, None; Guan-Hua Huang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  RO1AG021917
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 1361. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dayna S. Dalton, Karen J. Cruickshanks, Alex Pinto, Barbara E. Klein, Ronald Klein, Guan-Hua Huang; Accommodation in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):1361.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To objectively measure accommodative ability in a large cohort of adults.

Methods: : Subjects (N=2443, aged 21-84 years) were participants in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study. A Grand Seiko Autorefractor was used to obtain 3 measures of refractive error: distance correction, and with correction focusing on a near target at 2 and 4.5 diopters. Readings were converted to spherical equivalent (sphere + ½ cylinder) (SE). Participants were classified as myopic (SE ≤ -1.00), hyperopic (SE ≥ +1.00) or emmetropic (SE > -1.00 and < +1.00). At each of the two near point targets, the participant was considered to have lost accommodative ability if the spherical equivalent was ≥ -0.50. Subjects with cataract surgery were excluded.

Results: : In preliminary analyses 48% of participants did not accommodate at the 4.5D target and 45% did not accommodate at either target. Loss of ability to accommodate increased with age (OR 4.61; 95% CI 4.09-5.20, for each 5 year increase in age). Hyperopes were less likely to have loss of accommodative ability (OR compared to emmetropes, 0.40; 95% CI 0.27 - 0.60). Myopia and sex were not associated with accommodative ability. 11% of subjects 55-64 years and 8% of subjects 65-84 years retained accommodative ability.

Conclusions: : These measured data indicate that although loss of accommodative ability is very common in aging adults some older subjects retained accommodative ability. Some modifiable factors may be associated with age-related changes in accommodative ability.

Keywords: accommodation • aging: visual performance 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×