April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
A Comparison Of Macular Thickness Measurements For Different OCT Devices After Data Standardization And Common Segmentation Method
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yijun Huang
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Anne Goulding
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Sheri G. Alexander
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Jeong W. Pak
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Sapna Gangaputra
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Larry D. Hubbard
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Amitha Domalpally
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Qian Peng
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Ronald P. Danis
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Yijun Huang, Topcon Medical Systems, Inc. (C); Anne Goulding, None; Sheri G. Alexander, None; Jeong W. Pak, None; Sapna Gangaputra, None; Larry D. Hubbard, None; Amitha Domalpally, None; Qian Peng, None; Ronald P. Danis, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1017. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yijun Huang, Anne Goulding, Sheri G. Alexander, Jeong W. Pak, Sapna Gangaputra, Larry D. Hubbard, Amitha Domalpally, Qian Peng, Ronald P. Danis; A Comparison Of Macular Thickness Measurements For Different OCT Devices After Data Standardization And Common Segmentation Method. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1017.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine inter-device variability of macular thickness measurements among different Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) instruments after the data format was standardized and a common computer-assisted manual segmentation used.

Methods: : OCT scans were obtained from the maculae of both eyes in 4 normal subjects using 4 OCT devices, 3 spectral domain and 1 time domain. 3D cube, and 6-line radial scans (when available in the OCT devices), were performed. Repetitions of 3 scans were obtained for each scanning pattern. Images were then exported, normalized, and converted to DICOM OPT format, and viewed and analyzed in a custom software program. Boundary locations corresponding to the presumed inner limiting membrane (ILM), inner/outer segment junction (IS/OS), anterior border of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and Bruch’s membrane (BM) were manually identified by trained graders, and the layer boundaries were fit using spline interpolation. Mean values of the ILM-IS/OS, ILM-RPE, and ILM-BM thicknesses were calculated at the central and the inner subfields of the ETDRS-style macular grid (comprising 1, 3, 6mm concentric circles).

Results: : Using this standardization approach, the retinal thickness measurements are comparable among different OCT devices. The ranges of the mean thicknesses in the central field were: ILM-IS/OS, 178-221µm; ILM-RPE, 212-257µm; and ILM-BM, 251-302µm. The within-subject standard deviation were: ILM-IS/OS, 12.0µm centrally (C) and 9.6-12.7µm for the inner (IN) subfields; ILM-RPE, 11.9µm(C) and 8.9-14.6µm(IN); and ILM-BM, 12.4µm(C) and 10.1-16.7µm(IN).

Conclusions: : Thickness measurements of retinal layers from different OCT devices are comparable in normal subjects when (1) identical definitions of outer retinal boundaries are used, (2) the OCT images are standardized and analyzed in a common analysis platform, and (3) a computer assisted manual segmentation procedure is applied uniformly. With careful standardization of OCT images and layer segmentation method, OCT retinal thickness measurement from different devices may be pooled in multi-center clinical trials. Studies in patients with retinal diseases are required to further substantiate this approach.

Keywords: imaging/image analysis: clinical • retina • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×