April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Does Serial Optos Panoramic Imaging Improve Differential Diagnosis Of Glaucomatous RNFL Defects From Physiological RNFL "Slits"?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sanjeev Nath
    Eye Institute and Laser Center, New York, New York
  • Sarah MacIver
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Marc Sherman
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Juliana E. Boneta
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Dan Epshtein
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Jeremy Whitney
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Samantha Slotnick
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Jerome Sherman
    Eye Institute and Laser Center, New York, New York
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Sanjeev Nath, None; Sarah MacIver, None; Marc Sherman, None; Juliana E. Boneta, None; Dan Epshtein, None; Jeremy Whitney, None; Samantha Slotnick, None; Jerome Sherman, Optos (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Optos Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 1033. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sanjeev Nath, Sarah MacIver, Marc Sherman, Juliana E. Boneta, Dan Epshtein, Jeremy Whitney, Samantha Slotnick, Jerome Sherman; Does Serial Optos Panoramic Imaging Improve Differential Diagnosis Of Glaucomatous RNFL Defects From Physiological RNFL "Slits"?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):1033.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To demonstrate that RNFL defects can be imaged with optos p200 C, and to determine the prevalence of such defects and determine whether serial imaging is helpful.

 
Methods:
 

A prospective study of images from 500 consecutive patients seen from Jan to Oct in 2010 in a private practice setting. A scale of assessing RNFL defects was established: Category (C) 1: defects that were no wider than retinal veins and that did not fan out towards the periphery were classified as likely physiological ("slits"). C2-5: Pathological ("true") defects, were wider than retinal veins, and did fan out towards the periphery (C2: subtle focal defects, up to C5: profound focal and widespread.) SD OCT and GDx as well as 24-2 SS VF and disc assessment were used to confirm the Dx. Previous optos images (available in 290 patients) were also reviewed, for progression.

 
Results:
 

434 of the 1000 eyes reviewed had RNFL defects: 380 were C1 (slits). In 40 of these, confident placement into C1 (and not C2) was quite difficult. 24 were C2 (subtle) and 30 were C3-5 (well defined). In C3-5, all eyes showed defects on either OCT, GDx or VF. In C2, 50% had corresponding defects. 21 of the eyes in C2-5 had slits as well as true defects (see image). Follow-up optos imaging was available in 24 of the eyes with true defects; 4 demonstrated apparent progression. These 4 eyes were in 3 patients who reported good compliance with drops. 2 of these eyes initially showed RNFL bundle defects with sharp borders; the borders became less well defined over follow up. In C1 eyes, no slits appear to have progressed.

 
Conclusions:
 

RNFL defects can be imaged with optos p200C. Slits were far more common than true defects. GDx, OCT and VF defects showed a positive correlation with increasing RNFL defect severity. All slits were stable on serial imaging; some eyes with true defects progressed. As with fundus photography, serial imaging with optos has clinical utility.  

 
Keywords: nerve fiber layer • imaging/image analysis: clinical • retina 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×