March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Comparative Evaluation Of PRK and LASiK for Vision Enhancement After Implantation Of Presbyopic IOL
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joseph A. Khell
    Ophthalmology/Cornea,
    Ctr for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • Charles Kaiser
    Ophthalmology,
    Ctr for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • Frank Spektor
    Ophthalmology,
    Ctr for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • Eric Liss
    Ophthalmology,
    Ctr for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • William Trattler
    Ophthalmology/Cornea,
    Ctr for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • Carlos Buznego
    Ophthalmology/Cornea,
    Ctr for Excellence in Eyecare, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Joseph A. Khell, None; Charles Kaiser, None; Frank Spektor, None; Eric Liss, None; William Trattler, Dr Trattler is a consultant for Abbott Medical Optics (C); Carlos Buznego, Dr Buznego is a consultant for Alcon (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 1495. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joseph A. Khell, Charles Kaiser, Frank Spektor, Eric Liss, William Trattler, Carlos Buznego; Comparative Evaluation Of PRK and LASiK for Vision Enhancement After Implantation Of Presbyopic IOL. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):1495.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : The study was conducted retrospectively to compare visual outcomes in patients who received laser enhancement (PRK or LASiK) post phacoemulsification with presbyopic IOL implants.

Methods: : Eyes that received a presbyopic IOL unilaterally or bilaterally followed by laser enhancement (PRK or LASiK) were included in this study. All enhancements between April 2006 and November 2011 were included for analysis. Outcome measures included UCVA and diopters of astigmatism pre and post-enhancement.

Results: : 110 eyes with presbyopic IOLs (47.3% Restor, 29.1% Crystalens, 20.9% Tecnis Multifocal, 2.7% Rezoom,) that underwent laser vision correction enhancements were evaluated; 99 of these eyes received PRK, 11 received LASIK. Average age for PRK and LASIK groups was 66 and 62 years, respectively. 54.6 % of PRK patients and 45.5% of LASiK patients were male. 49/99 (49.5%) eyes that underwent PRK had ≥1D of astigmatism preoperatively, compared to 17/99 (17.1%) eyes post-laser vision correction. 10/11 (90.9%) eyes that underwent LASIK had ≥1D of astigmatism preoperatively, compared to 1/11 (9.1%) eyes post-laser vision correction 18.2% of PRK eyes and 27.3% of LASIK eyes had UCDVA of 20/30 or better pre-enhancement. 78.8% of PRK eyes and 81.8% of LASIK eyes had UCDVA of 20/30 or better post-enhancement. 94% of PRK and 82% of LASIK eyes had improvement of ≥1 lines UCVA.

Conclusions: : This preliminary comparison of PRK and LASiK for improving vision in patients who are post presbyopic IOL implantation suggests that both techniques can effectively improve visual acuity.

Keywords: refractive surgery: PRK • refractive surgery: LASIK • presbyopia 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×