April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
A Prospective Randomised Trial Of Trabeculectomy Using Mitomycin C Vs. An OlogenTM Implant (Version 2) In Open Angle Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andre Rosentreter
    Department of Ophthalmolgy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Andrea M. Schild
    Department of Ophthalmolgy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Stergiani Gaki
    Department of Ophthalmolgy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Anne C. Mellein
    Department of Ophthalmolgy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Thomas S. Dietlein
    Department of Ophthalmolgy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Andre Rosentreter, P.J.Dahlhausen GmbH (Cologne, Germany) supported the study. The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research. No authors have any financial/conflicting interests to disclose. (F); Andrea M. Schild, None; Stergiani Gaki, None; Anne C. Mellein, None; Thomas S. Dietlein, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  P.J.Dahlhausen GmbH (Cologne, Germany) supported the study. The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research. No authors have any financial/conflicting interests to disclose.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 624. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andre Rosentreter, Andrea M. Schild, Stergiani Gaki, Anne C. Mellein, Thomas S. Dietlein; A Prospective Randomised Trial Of Trabeculectomy Using Mitomycin C Vs. An OlogenTM Implant (Version 2) In Open Angle Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):624.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To present the results of the interim analysis of the prospective randomised clinical trial which assesses the efficacy and complications of trabeculectomy with a biodegradable implant (ologenTM implant, version 2) versus trabeculectomy using mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma.

Methods: : In the MMC group (10 patients) trabeculectomy was performed according to standard protocols. In the ologenTM group (10 patients) after standard trabeculectomy the implant was positioned on top of the scleral flap and no mitomycin C was applied. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, visual field, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and filtering bleb score were recorded.

Results: : The mean preoperative IOP was 26.9 ± 10.5 mmHg for the ologen group and 22.8 ± 4.7 mmHg for the MMC group (p = 0.34). Three months after surgery the mean IOP was 12.3 ± 1.9 mmHg in the ologenTM group (p<0.01, 54 % reduction) and 9.9 ± 3.5 mmHg in the MMC group (p<0.01, 57 % reduction). No antiglaucomatous medication was necessary in both groups; in all cases absolute success was achieved.

Conclusions: : MMC and ologenTM seem to be adequate adjuncts in antiglaucomatous filtering surgery. Observations over a longer period and with larger numbers of patients are required to confirm these findings and to examine the role of ologen in antiglaucomatous surgery.

Clinical Trial: : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01174420

Keywords: wound healing • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×