April 2011
Volume 52, Issue 14
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2011
Measurement Of Intraocular Pressure Using The Rebound-Tonometer IOPen In Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicole Stuebiger
    Department of Ophthalmology, Charite, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Andrea Weiss
    Department of Ophthalmic Optics, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfsburg, Germany
  • Holger Specht
    Department of Medical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences, Stralsund, Germany
  • Tobias Hudde
    Eye Clinic, Wolfsburg, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Nicole Stuebiger, None; Andrea Weiss, None; Holger Specht, None; Tobias Hudde, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2011, Vol.52, 678. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicole Stuebiger, Andrea Weiss, Holger Specht, Tobias Hudde; Measurement Of Intraocular Pressure Using The Rebound-Tonometer IOPen In Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(14):678.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : In clinical practice ophthalmologists often need a tonometer which is independent of a slit lamp. Such a hand-held device is the rebound-tonometer IOPen. We compared the results of the IOPen with Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Methods: : Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) was done in 189 eyes of 95 patients (mean age 66+/-15 years) suffering from ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Both eyes were measured using the IOPen first and the Goldmann applanation tonometer second. Patients were placed in an upright position for all measurements.

Results: : Even for well-trained examiners a learning curve of approximately 10 measurements was observed using the IOPen. The IOPen measured an average IOP of 14.4mmHg (OD 14.27+/-3.31mmHg; OS 14.53+/-3.01mmHg) in all 189 eyes. The Goldmann tonometer measured an average IOP 14.3mmHg (OD 13.98+/-2.25mmHg; OS 14.62+/-2.43mmHg). In about 51.6% of all eyes the IOPen achieved IOPvalues which were higher than these in the Goldmann applantion tonometry. The mean IOP difference in mmHg between the two devices was 2.42+/-1.75mmHg in OD and 2.24+/-1.67mmHg in OS. The differences were statistically not significant.

Conclusions: : Measurement of IOP with the IOPen is comparable to Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications • detection 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.